IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v383y2025ics0277953625007683.html

Expectation vs reality: A case study of the impact of the da Vinci surgical robot on healthcare professionals’ work experiences

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Hong Yu
  • Hayton, James

Abstract

In recent years, considerable academic attention has been devoted to the use of new technology in the healthcare sector. However, there is limited empirical knowledge about how everyday professional work is affected or how professionals actually experience these changes. This article assesses the introduction of the da Vinci surgical robot in the colorectal surgery department of a National Health Service Hospital in England. It argues that the impact of technology on healthcare workers is not predetermined by the characteristics of a technology and should be understood as a combination of positive and negative experiences in specific, highly contextualised workplace settings. Benefits to patients of the da Vinci surgical robot are clinically promising, but its implementation continues to be difficult, and the trade-offs look much different for varying employee groups. Our ethnographic method enables us to present this finding in granular detail: the da Vinci surgical robot can improve the morale and occupational health of the healthcare professionals in this hospital, yet negative impacts such as anxiety associated with conducting new operation procedures are commonly experienced by surgical team members. This article covers themes such as recruitment, preparation, and training, and offers much-needed insights into the long-term development of the healthcare workforce in England and beyond.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Hong Yu & Hayton, James, 2025. "Expectation vs reality: A case study of the impact of the da Vinci surgical robot on healthcare professionals’ work experiences," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 383(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:383:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625007683
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118437
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625007683
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118437?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ulucanlar, S. & Faulkner, A. & Peirce, S. & Elwyn, G., 2013. "Technology identity: The role of sociotechnical representations in the adoption of medical devices," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 95-105.
    2. Abrishami, Payam & Boer, Albert & Horstman, Klasien, 2014. "Understanding the adoption dynamics of medical innovations: Affordances of the da Vinci robot in the Netherlands," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 125-133.
    3. S. A. Høyland & K. A. Holte & B. Gjerstad & I. L. Teig, 2023. "A System Perspective on Implementation and Usage of the Da Vinci Technology at a Large Norwegian Regional Hospital’," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, September.
    4. repec:hal:journl:hal-03278865 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Petrakaki, Dimitra & Barber, Nick & Waring, Justin, 2012. "The possibilities of technology in shaping healthcare professionals: (Re/De-)Professionalisation of pharmacists in England," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(2), pages 429-437.
    6. Petrakaki, Dimitra & Klecun, Ela, 2015. "Hybridity as a process of technology's ‘translation’: customizing a national Electronic Patient Record," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 60437, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Petrakaki, Dimitra & Klecun, Ela, 2015. "Hybridity as a process of technology's ‘translation’: Customizing a national Electronic Patient Record," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 224-231.
    8. Heloise Agreli Fernandes & Ruthanne Huising & Marina Peduzzi, 2021. "Role reconfiguration : what ethnographic studies tell us about the implications of technological change for work and collaboration in healthcare," Post-Print hal-03229513, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Qin & Wang, Hongchuan & Ma, Chengcheng & Ru, Peng, 2025. "How professionals respond to disruptive effects of artificial intelligence on their jurisdiction: The role of interactive governance," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 386(C).
    2. Vale, Mira D. & Perkins, Denise White, 2022. "Discuss and remember: Clinician strategies for integrating social determinants of health in patient records and care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    3. Daskalopoulou, Athanasia & Palmer, Mark, 2021. "Persistent institutional breaches: Technology use in healthcare work," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    4. Rhodes, Tim & Lancaster, Kari, 2019. "Evidence-making interventions in health: A conceptual framing," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Askfors, Ylva & Fornstedt, Helena, 2018. "The clash of managerial and professional logics in public procurement: Implications for innovation in the health-care sector," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 78-90.
    6. Carboni, Chiara & Wehrens, Rik & van der Veen, Romke & de Bont, Antoinette, 2022. "Conceptualizing the digitalization of healthcare work: A metaphor-based Critical Interpretive Synthesis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    7. Borozdina, Ekaterina, 2024. "Instant messengers and health professionals’ agency in Russian clinical settings," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 359(C).
    8. Francesca Iandolo & Pietro Vito & Irene Fulco & Francesca Loia, 2018. "From Health Technology Assessment to Health Technology Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, December.
    9. Thune, Taran & Mina, Andrea, 2016. "Hospitals as innovators in the health-care system: A literature review and research agenda," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(8), pages 1545-1557.
    10. Stanislav Birko & Edward S Dove & Vural Özdemir, 2015. "Evaluation of Nine Consensus Indices in Delphi Foresight Research and Their Dependency on Delphi Survey Characteristics: A Simulation Study and Debate on Delphi Design and Interpretation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-14, August.
    11. Florian Niehaus & Christoph Schank & Francesco Schiavone, 2026. "How healthcare professionals overcome distance when collaborating with smart robots," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 1357-1384, April.
    12. Wadmann, Sarah & Johansen, Anna Brueckner & Born, Alfred Peter & Kessel, Line, 2024. "Infrastructuring precision medicine: Making gene therapies for rare diseases workable in practice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 351(C).
    13. Ivlev, Ilya & Vacek, Jakub & Kneppo, Peter, 2015. "Multi-criteria decision analysis for supporting the selection of medical devices under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(1), pages 216-228.
    14. Pedersen, Kirstine Zinck & Roelsgaard Obling, Anne, 2020. "‘It's all about time’: Temporal effects of cancer pathway introduction in treatment and care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    15. Waring, Justin & Latif, Asam & Boyd, Matthew & Barber, Nick & Elliott, Rachel, 2016. "Pastoral power in the community pharmacy: A Foucauldian analysis of services to promote patient adherence to new medicine use," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 123-130.
    16. Conway, Anna & Marshall, Alison D. & Grebely, Jason & Fontaine, Guillaume & Treloar, Carla, 2025. "Professional identities and new technologies of hepatitis C point-of-care testing," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 378(C).
    17. Assing Hvidt, Elisabeth & Grønning, Anette & Nisbeth Brøgger, Matilde & Møller, Jane Ege & Fage-Butler, Antoinette, 2021. "Multilevel structures and human agency in relation to email consultations: A strong structuration theory analysis of the Danish general practice setting," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    18. Kroezen, M. & Mistiaen, P. & van Dijk, L. & Groenewegen, P.P. & Francke, A.L., 2014. "Negotiating jurisdiction in the workplace: A multiple-case study of nurse prescribing in hospital settings," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 107-115.
    19. Olive, Mattia Vincenzo & Gastaldi, Luca & Radaelli, Giovanni, 2026. "Making the invisible visible: nurses’ stealth work to legitimize their telemedicine coordination role," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 388(C).
    20. Soekijad, Maura, 2025. "Efficiency paradox: Introducing secure messaging in outpatient care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 365(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:383:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625007683. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.