IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v383y2025ics0277953625007506.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unmasking stigma: Understanding psychosocial distance toward pandemic-recovered individuals and lessons for future pandemics

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Xiaoguang
  • Guo, Xiaoxian

Abstract

Throughout human history, pandemics have repeatedly revealed a persistent pattern of disease-related stigma. This phenomenon highlights the critical need to address this recurring social challenge. In light of the most recent COVID-19 pandemic, it is evident that there are vital lessons to be learned. This study examined whether pandemic-recovered individuals (PRIs) faced disease-related stigma and experienced psychosocial distance by utilizing representative social survey data, including a vignette experiment on social interaction. The findings demonstrated that PRIs were subject to disease-related stigma as participants in this study exhibited significantly reduced willingness to engage socially with hypothetical PRIs during the pandemic. This psychosocial distance was particularly pronounced among individuals with higher levels of education, social status, and social capital. To prepare for future pandemics, societies must draw on these lessons and mitigate psychosocial distance by strengthening formal institutions and improving the dissemination of accurate information.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Xiaoguang & Guo, Xiaoxian, 2025. "Unmasking stigma: Understanding psychosocial distance toward pandemic-recovered individuals and lessons for future pandemics," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 383(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:383:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625007506
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118419
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625007506
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118419?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:383:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625007506. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.