IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v382y2025ics0277953625007038.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

No one wants to be a good patient: Intersectionality and agency in the sick role

Author

Listed:
  • Lu, Weiwei

Abstract

Making treatment decisions is a responsibility of the sick role granted to ill people. Despite many social roles being granted to ill people, intersecting with the patient role, little is known about what roles and how they intersect in decision-making, particularly what motivates patients to perform patient behaviors under this situation. This study explores the intersectionality and agency in the sick role in cancer treatment decision-making. Thirty-two interviews with cancer patients reveal the multiple identities, intersected identities, and preferred identities in decision-making on cancer treatment. Surprisingly, the findings show no one claims that they want to be a good patient. The agency to perform a patient role comes from the non-patient preferred identity. This finding informs a narrative approach that regards cancer patients as persons situated in multiple social systems and narrative contexts and thus physicians and all the healthcare stakeholders can facilitate patients’ preferred identity to improve their agency in treatment decision-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Lu, Weiwei, 2025. "No one wants to be a good patient: Intersectionality and agency in the sick role," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 382(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:382:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625007038
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118372
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625007038
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118372?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:382:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625007038. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.