IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v382y2025ics0277953625006781.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Slow mobility & medicine: A critical review

Author

Listed:
  • Loo, Becky P.Y.
  • Lian, Ting

Abstract

This critical review examines the complex interplay between slow mobility modes—specifically walking, cycling, and micromobility—and their associated health and environmental impacts. It is timely in view of various global initiatives to promote walkability and cyclability, and a paradigm shift towards people-oriented transport systems. Based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we selected 458 papers and conducted detailed content analysis. The paper first identifies key themes related to risk and benefits, pinpointing traffic crashes as the key risk and enhanced physical and mental health, as well as increased accessibility, as key benefits. Secondly, it examines the main scope, revealing a focus on the general population rather than vulnerable groups. Geographically, there is a concentration of studies in Europe, North America, and East Asia, with under-representations in other regions. Lastly, common features and relationships are examined through a co-occurrence network analysis. The review underscores the need for targeted research and policy interventions not only to address the full range of health risk but also to enhance diverse benefits of slow mobility.

Suggested Citation

  • Loo, Becky P.Y. & Lian, Ting, 2025. "Slow mobility & medicine: A critical review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 382(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:382:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625006781
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118347
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625006781
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118347?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:382:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625006781. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.