IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v382y2025ics0277953625006574.html

Frequent callers to the emergency medical services: A mixed-methods study of call patterns, reasons for calling, and wellbeing

Author

Listed:
  • Gehrt, Tine Bennedsen
  • Laursen, Camilla Brændstrup
  • Lock, Marie Kryger
  • Bossen, Claus
  • Huibers, Linda
  • Væggemose, Ulla

Abstract

Emergency medical services handle acute and life-threatening medical situations. Despite their global availability, research on those who frequently call these services is sparse. The present study aims to examine call patterns, motivations for calling, and indicators of well-being among frequent callers to the emergency medical services by utilizing multiple data sources. The study was conducted in the Central Denmark Region, Denmark. During a four-month period (May to August 2023), we identified all individuals, who had made ≥5 calls to the emergency medical services within the previous six months (i.e. frequent callers). Following a new call, frequent callers aged ≥18 years were invited to complete a questionnaire, attend an interview, or both. In total, 413 frequent callers were identified, representing 2.3 % of all callers to the emergency medical services during the study period. The frequent callers accounted for 1803 calls during the four months, representing 7.1 % of all emergency calls. Seventeen frequent callers completed the questionnaire. They reported varying levels of psychological well-being, and that a major reason for calling was not being able to endure their symptoms or problems anymore. Thematic analysis of interviews with 12 frequent callers highlighted four main themes: 'everyone calls the emergency medical services for a reason', ''help' can take many forms', 'difficulty navigating the healthcare system', and 'unfulfilled expectations and disappointment with 'the system''. The findings indicate that frequent callers to the emergency medical services comprise a small but diverse group, accounting for many calls. A central theme across data sources was difficulty navigating the healthcare system.

Suggested Citation

  • Gehrt, Tine Bennedsen & Laursen, Camilla Brændstrup & Lock, Marie Kryger & Bossen, Claus & Huibers, Linda & Væggemose, Ulla, 2025. "Frequent callers to the emergency medical services: A mixed-methods study of call patterns, reasons for calling, and wellbeing," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 382(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:382:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625006574
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118326
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625006574
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118326?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Soril, Lesley J.J. & Leggett, Laura E. & Lorenzetti, Diane L. & Noseworthy, Tom W. & Clement, Fiona M., 2016. "Characteristics of frequent users of the emergency department in the general adult population: A systematic review of international healthcare systems," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(5), pages 452-461.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dominic Trépel & Manuel Ruiz-Adame & Marica Cassarino & Elayne Ahern & Collette Devlin & Katie Robinson & Íde O’Shaughnessy & Gerard McCarthy & Cian Corcoran & Rose Galvin, 2024. "The cost effectiveness of early assessment and intervention by a dedicated health and social care professional team for older adults in the emergency department compared to treatment-as-usual: Economic evaluation of the OPTI-MEND trial," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(6), pages 1-12, June.
    2. Singer, Alexander & Kosowan, Leanne & Katz, Alan & Ronksley, Paul & McBrien, Kerry & Halas, Gayle & Williamson, Tyler, 2020. "Characterizing patients with high use of the primary and tertiary care systems: A retrospective cohort study," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(3), pages 291-297.
    3. Carla Maria Gramaglia & Eleonora Gambaro & Alessandro Feggi & Amalia Jona & Valentina Zanoli & Francesco Gavelli & Gian Carlo Avanzi & Daniela Ferrante & Silviana Maria Patratanu & Erica Valerio & Pat, 2025. "Frequent Users in Psychiatric Consultations: A 6-Year Retrospective Study in the Emergency Department," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(6), pages 1-14, May.
    4. Ryuichi Ohta & Emily Weiss & Magda Mekky & Chiaki Sano, 2022. "Relationship between Dysphagia and Home Discharge among Older Patients Receiving Hospital Rehabilitation in Rural Japan: A Retrospective Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-17, August.
    5. Neil, Amanda L. & Chappell, Kate & Wagg, Fiona & Miller, April & Judd, Fiona, 2021. "The Tasmanian Conception to Community (C2C) Study Database 2008-09 to 2013-14: Using linked health administrative data to address each piece in the puzzle," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    6. Hwayeon Danielle Shin & Sheri Price & Megan Aston, 2021. "A poststructural analysis: Current practices for suicide prevention by nurses in the emergency department and areas of improvement," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1-2), pages 287-297, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:382:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625006574. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.