IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v382y2025ics0277953625000322.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trajectories of loneliness in later life – Evidence from a 10-year English panel study

Author

Listed:
  • Di Gessa, Giorgio
  • Bordone, Valeria
  • Arpino, Bruno

Abstract

The prevalence of loneliness is higher among older people; however, few studies have examined its longitudinal patterns and associated risk factors, particularly social network resources. Using data from six waves of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (2008/09 to 2018/19, N = 4740) and group-based trajectory modelling (GBTM), we identified five groups of loneliness trajectories: three with stable levels (37% “stable low”; 26% “stable medium”; 9% “stable high”) and two with time-varying scores of loneliness (8% “increasing”; 20% “decreasing”). Multinomial regression models and GBTM were used to examine baseline and time-varying factors associated with these trajectories. We created composite measures to capture the presence and key facets of social network resources (including size, support, closeness, and frequency of contact) for four different social relationship domains (partner, children, immediate family, and friends). Our results show that, among those with family or friends, older people with higher social network resources and those who maintained or improved them over time reported lower levels of loneliness. Findings also suggest that all social relationship domains contributed to feelings of loneliness in later life. Also, we find that respondents in poor health and depressed, as well as those whose health deteriorated over time, were more likely to have stable high or increasing levels of loneliness. The study highlights the need to investigate loneliness from a life course perspective, account for the complexity of social relationships in later life beyond their mere presence or absence, and include their quality and quantity as well as multiple domains of family and intergenerational relationships.

Suggested Citation

  • Di Gessa, Giorgio & Bordone, Valeria & Arpino, Bruno, 2025. "Trajectories of loneliness in later life – Evidence from a 10-year English panel study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 382(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:382:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625000322
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117703
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625000322
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117703?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:382:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625000322. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.