Author
Listed:
- Guerrero, Estefania
- Barrios, Maite
- Sampietro, Hernán María
- Aza, Alba
- Guilera, Georgina
- Gómez-Benito, Juana
Abstract
Current public policies emphasize the need for recovery-oriented services. However, a lack of consensus on the meaning of recovery poses challenges for implementing recovery-oriented interventions. This study aims to establish an international consensus on the key elements of recovery from the clinician perspective, specifically from recovery-oriented mental health professionals. A three-round Delphi study was conducted to gather expert opinions on the definition of recovery, progress indicators, and factors that facilitate and hinder recovery. Seventy-eight recovery-oriented professionals agreed to participate and completed a sociodemographic questionnaire after providing informed consent. In the first Delphi round, open-ended questions were used to gather initial opinions, which were analyzed and compiled into a list of statements. In the second and third rounds, participants rated the relevance of each statement using a Likert-type scale. Statements rated as “relevant” or “very relevant” by at least 80 % of participants were considered consensus statements. Recovery was defined as the development of a sense of agency, empowerment, autonomy, and self-determination. Key indicators emphasized agency, empowerment, user safety, and informed decision-making. Facilitators included the promotion of self-determination, a holistic approach within services, and the integration of peer support. Social exclusion emerged as the most significant obstacle to recovery. This study provides an international consensus on the key elements of recovery in mental health from the perspective of recovery-oriented professionals, offering insights for implementing interventions, developing recovery-oriented services, and refining measurement instruments.
Suggested Citation
Guerrero, Estefania & Barrios, Maite & Sampietro, Hernán María & Aza, Alba & Guilera, Georgina & Gómez-Benito, Juana, 2025.
"Recovery in mental health: An international Delphi study from a recovery-oriented professional perspective,"
Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 381(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:socmed:v:381:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625006331
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118302
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:381:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625006331. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.