IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v381y2025ics027795362500615x.html

Tailoring anxiety assessment for Parkinson's disease: The Chinese Parkinson anxiety scale with cultural and situational anxiety considerations

Author

Listed:
  • Poon, Shu-Fai
  • Tan, Chun-Hsiang
  • Hong, Wei-Pin
  • Chen, Kao Chin
  • Yu, Rwei-Ling

Abstract

Recognizing the gap in mental health assessment, particularly in evaluating anxiety among Parkinson's disease (PD) patients, with an emphasis on cultural context and PD-specific situational anxiety. This study aimed to refine the Parkinson Anxiety Scale (PAS) and emphasized the importance of health equity by addressing cultural context and PD-specific situational anxiety. The revised version, named the Chinese Parkinson Anxiety Scale (CPAS), was developed to include PD-specific situational anxiety and culturally relevant items, addressing the unique challenges faced by the Eastern PD population. The CPAS was designed to reflect Eastern cultural nuances and PD-specific anxiety factors. Involving 138 PD patients and 122 healthy controls, the study assessed participants using the CPAS, Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scale. The scale's reliability (i.e., internal consistency and test-retest reliability) and validity (i.e., construct, concurrent, convergent, and discriminate validity) were rigorously evaluated. The CPAS demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.954) and test-retest reliability (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient = 0.77). It showed significant concurrent validity, evidenced by notable differences between PD patients and healthy controls. The scale also exhibited convergent solid validity with the BAI (r = 0.585; p < 0.001) and acceptable discriminant validity with the ADL (r = −0.086; p = 0.166). The inclusion of PD situational anxiety items was a key addition, showing a more significant impact on PD patients than the original scale factors. With its robust psychometric properties and culturally sensitive approach, the CPAS emerges as a comprehensive tool for assessing anxiety in the Chinese PD population, advancing both clinical care and health equity.

Suggested Citation

  • Poon, Shu-Fai & Tan, Chun-Hsiang & Hong, Wei-Pin & Chen, Kao Chin & Yu, Rwei-Ling, 2025. "Tailoring anxiety assessment for Parkinson's disease: The Chinese Parkinson anxiety scale with cultural and situational anxiety considerations," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 381(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:381:y:2025:i:c:s027795362500615x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118284
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027795362500615X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118284?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yi-Chen Cheng & Chun-Hsien Su, 2020. "Evidence Supports PA Prescription for Parkinson’s Disease: Motor Symptoms and Non-Motor Features: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-13, April.
    2. Pua, Shin-Yii & Yu, Rwei-Ling, 2024. "Effects of executive function on age-related emotion recognition decline varied by sex," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 361(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Keywords

      ;
      ;
      ;
      ;
      ;

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:381:y:2025:i:c:s027795362500615x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.