IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v381y2025ics0277953625005829.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contested illness, contested identity: How women with fibromyalgia construct legitimacy online

Author

Listed:
  • Kerr, Jenna M.
  • DeMichelis, Carey

Abstract

This research explores the lived experiences of women with fibromyalgia (FM) and the various ways they go about legitimizing a contested medical condition. Through ethnographic observation in a private online community, “Fibro Women Canada,” and in-depth interviews with its members, we explore how women work to be seen as legitimate pain patients in the eyes of their healthcare providers. We argue that FM produces a dilemma of legitimacy, a dilemma of identity, and a dilemma of morality for its sufferers. In the face of these dilemmas, Fibro Women Canada functions as a backstage environment that supports two distinct, yet interwoven, forms of legitimacy building: (1) illness literacy, and (2) identity work. In particular, we attend to the moral stakes of seeking biomedical recognition, illuminating the every-day strategies that women use to construct themselves as deserving of care.

Suggested Citation

  • Kerr, Jenna M. & DeMichelis, Carey, 2025. "Contested illness, contested identity: How women with fibromyalgia construct legitimacy online," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 381(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:381:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625005829
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118251
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625005829
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118251?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:381:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625005829. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.