IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v381y2025ics027795362500543x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feeling connected, feeling poor? The dual impact of everyday interactions with neighbors and relative deprivation on subjective well-being

Author

Listed:
  • Zangger, Christoph

Abstract

How do everyday interactions with family, friends and neighbors influence people’s subjective well-being? Using five waves of panel data from an ecological momentary assessment with more than 180 randomly sampled participants in Switzerland, this paper examines how and for whom social interactions in the neighborhood influence affective states as well as life satisfaction. Investigating both quantitative and qualitative impacts of everyday relations, this paper finds that more frequent interactions with neighbors during the past week lead to higher levels of positive affect. However, interacting more frequently with neighbors does not influence negative affect or life satisfaction. Meanwhile, more frequent interactions with friends and family are particularly relevant for life satisfaction and lead to lower negative affect. What is more, cross-lagged panel models with fixed effects show that these effects are not subject to reverse causality. Meanwhile, a significant effect of feeling poorer than one’s neighbors on all three outcome stresses the importance of a more nuanced view. In addition, the overall quality of interactions with neighbors and how these interactions are characterized by respondents also matter. These results caution against simplified policies to overcome social isolation and loneliness that aim at increasing social interaction within local communities irrespective of one’s standing therein and the nature of one’s everyday encounters and contacts.

Suggested Citation

  • Zangger, Christoph, 2025. "Feeling connected, feeling poor? The dual impact of everyday interactions with neighbors and relative deprivation on subjective well-being," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 381(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:381:y:2025:i:c:s027795362500543x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118213
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027795362500543X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118213?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:381:y:2025:i:c:s027795362500543x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.