IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v381y2025ics027795362500543x.html

Feeling connected, feeling poor? The dual impact of everyday interactions with neighbors and relative deprivation on subjective well-being

Author

Listed:
  • Zangger, Christoph

Abstract

How do everyday interactions with family, friends and neighbors influence people’s subjective well-being? Using five waves of panel data from an ecological momentary assessment with more than 180 randomly sampled participants in Switzerland, this paper examines how and for whom social interactions in the neighborhood influence affective states as well as life satisfaction. Investigating both quantitative and qualitative impacts of everyday relations, this paper finds that more frequent interactions with neighbors during the past week lead to higher levels of positive affect. However, interacting more frequently with neighbors does not influence negative affect or life satisfaction. Meanwhile, more frequent interactions with friends and family are particularly relevant for life satisfaction and lead to lower negative affect. What is more, cross-lagged panel models with fixed effects show that these effects are not subject to reverse causality. Meanwhile, a significant effect of feeling poorer than one’s neighbors on all three outcome stresses the importance of a more nuanced view. In addition, the overall quality of interactions with neighbors and how these interactions are characterized by respondents also matter. These results caution against simplified policies to overcome social isolation and loneliness that aim at increasing social interaction within local communities irrespective of one’s standing therein and the nature of one’s everyday encounters and contacts.

Suggested Citation

  • Zangger, Christoph, 2025. "Feeling connected, feeling poor? The dual impact of everyday interactions with neighbors and relative deprivation on subjective well-being," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 381(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:381:y:2025:i:c:s027795362500543x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118213
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027795362500543X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118213?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yanjie Bian & Mingsong Hao & Yaojun Li, 2018. "Social Networks and Subjective Well-Being: A Comparison of Australia, Britain, and China," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 19(8), pages 2489-2508, December.
    2. Ludwig, Jens & Duncan, Greg J. & Katz, Lawrence F. & Kessler, Ronald & Kling, Jeffrey R. & Gennetian, Lisa A. & Sanbonmatsu, Lisa, 2012. "Neighborhood Effects on the Long-Term Well-Being of Low-Income Adults," Scholarly Articles 11870359, Harvard University Department of Economics.
    3. Mouratidis, Kostas, 2020. "Neighborhood characteristics, neighborhood satisfaction, and well-being: The links with neighborhood deprivation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    4. Robinette, Jennifer W. & Charles, Susan T. & Mogle, Jacqueline A. & Almeida, David M., 2013. "Neighborhood cohesion and daily well-being: Results from a diary study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 174-182.
    5. Noy, Shakked & Sin, Isabelle, 2021. "The effects of neighbourhood and workplace income comparisons on subjective wellbeing," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 918-945.
    6. Jeffrey M Wooldridge, 2010. "Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 2, volume 1, number 0262232588, December.
    7. Mario L. Small & Kristina Brant & Maleah Fekete, 2024. "The Avoidance of Strong Ties," American Sociological Review, , vol. 89(4), pages 615-649, August.
    8. Samuelson Appau & Sefa Awaworyi Churchill & Lisa Farrell, 2019. "Social integration and subjective wellbeing," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(16), pages 1748-1761, April.
    9. Franco Bonomi Bezzo & Laura Silva & Maarten van Ham, 2021. "The combined effect of Covid-19 and neighbourhood deprivation on two dimensions of subjective well-being: Empirical evidence from England," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(7), pages 1-19, July.
    10. Lars Leszczensky & Tobias Wolbring, 2022. "How to Deal With Reverse Causality Using Panel Data? Recommendations for Researchers Based on a Simulation Study," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 51(2), pages 837-865, May.
    11. Mariska Horst & Hilde Coffé, 2012. "How Friendship Network Characteristics Influence Subjective Well-Being," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 107(3), pages 509-529, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Coustaury, Camille & Jeannot, Elias & Moreau, Adele & Nietge, Clotilde & Maharani, Asri & Richards, Lindsay & Präg, Patrick, 2023. "Subjective socioeconomic status and self-rated health in the English Longitudinal Study of Aging: A fixed-effects analysis☆☆We thank the anonymous reviewers of Social Science & Medicine for their helpful comments. Data (Phelps et al., 2020) used in t," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    2. Zuzana Brokešová & Andrej Cupak & Anthony Lepinteur & Marian Rizov, 2025. "Real Assets and Subjective Well-Being: Using a Novel Measure for Relative Effects," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 180(3), pages 1567-1591, December.
    3. Liping Liao & Wenjie Wu & Chenglei Zhang, 2022. "Housing prices and the subjective well-being of migrant workers: evidence from China," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 23(7), pages 3363-3388, October.
    4. Guo, Shu & Zhang, ZhongXiang, "undated". "Can the diligent governance increase subjective wellbeing? New evidence from environmental regulations in China," FEEM Working Papers 317125, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    5. Jahen F. Rezki, 2022. "Political competition and economic performance: evidence from Indonesia," Economics of Governance, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 83-114, June.
    6. Godwin Kwabla Ekpe & Anna A. Klis, 2023. "Spillover Effects in Irrigated Agriculture from the Groundwater Commons," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 86(3), pages 469-507, November.
    7. Demetrescu, Matei & Frondel, Manuel & Tomberg, Lukas & Vance, Colin, 2025. "Fixed effects, lagged dependent variables, and bracketing: Cautionary remarks," Ruhr Economic Papers 1151, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    8. Frimpong, Stephen, 2024. "Against Democracy, Neo-totalitarianism, or What? A Cross-Country Dynamic Panel Endogenous Switching Regressing Analysis of Innovation, Economic Growth, and Political Stability," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 36(C).
    9. Martinez-Garcia, Irma & Terjesen, Siri & Gomez-Anson, Silvia, 2024. "Regulating board gender diversity in Europe: The influence of cultural, governmental, and women’s institutions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    10. Lee, Taehyun & Heshmati, Almas, 2025. "The relationship between household debt and the Big Five personality traits," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    11. Mengyuan Zhou, 2022. "Does the Source of Inheritance Matter in Bequest Attitudes? Evidence from Japan," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 867-887, December.
    12. Campbell, Randall C. & Nagel, Gregory L., 2016. "Private information and limitations of Heckman's estimator in banking and corporate finance research," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 186-195.
    13. Christopher Dick-Sagoe & Ernest Ngeh Tingum & Peter Asare-Nuamah & Denis N. Yuni & Nicholas Baidoo, 2025. "Central transfers and incentives to collect local revenue among the Central Region of Ghana’s local government officials: analysing the flypaper effect," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    14. Ilona Babenko & Benjamin Bennett & John M Bizjak & Jeffrey L Coles & Jason J Sandvik, 2023. "Clawback Provisions and Firm Risk," The Review of Corporate Finance Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 12(2), pages 191-239.
    15. Şahan, Duygu & Tuna, Okan, 2018. "Environmental innovation of transportation sector in OECD countries," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Blecker, Thorsten & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), The Road to a Digitalized Supply Chain Management: Smart and Digital Solutions for Supply Chain Management. Proceedings of the Hamburg International C, volume 25, pages 157-170, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    16. Ruomeng Cui & Dennis J. Zhang & Achal Bassamboo, 2019. "Learning from Inventory Availability Information: Evidence from Field Experiments on Amazon," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(3), pages 1216-1235, March.
    17. Foliano, Francesca & Tonei, Valentina & Sevilla, Almudena, 2024. "Social restrictions, leisure and well-being," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    18. Luiz Paulo Fávero & Joseph F. Hair & Rafael de Freitas Souza & Matheus Albergaria & Talles V. Brugni, 2021. "Zero-Inflated Generalized Linear Mixed Models: A Better Way to Understand Data Relationships," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-28, May.
    19. Shaikh M. S. U. Eskander & Sam Fankhauser, 2022. "Income Diversification and Income Inequality: Household Responses to the 2013 Floods in Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, January.
    20. Meng, Chang & Ghafoori, Noorulhaq, 2024. "The economic impact of terrorism in South Asia," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:381:y:2025:i:c:s027795362500543x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.