IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v380y2025ics0277953625005659.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Paradoxical effects of community social cohesion on mental health and help-seeking among older adults: The role of reputation concern and socioeconomic status

Author

Listed:
  • Huang, Kuan-Ju
  • Uchida, Yukiko
  • Takemura, Kosuke
  • Fukushima, Shintaro
  • Aida, Jun
  • Hanazato, Masamichi
  • Kanamori, Mariko

Abstract

There is no consensus on whether community social cohesion has positive or negative impacts on mental health. In this study, we hypothesized that strong social norms in highly cohesive communities might increase concerns about reputation, which could negatively affect mental health and help-seeking. We analyzed data from 23,672 adults aged 65 years or older from the 2019 wave of the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study (JAGES). Cross-sectional multilevel analyses revealed that individual-level social cohesion—measured by community trust, reciprocity, and place attachment—predicted fewer depressive symptoms and lower reluctance to seek help. However, at the community level, social cohesion predicted higher concerns about reputation, which in turn predicted more depressive symptoms. Notably, this association was stronger among individuals with lower educational attainment, suggesting that they may experience greater reputational pressure within highly cohesive communities. These findings support our hypothesis that community social cohesion may be linked to negative outcomes due to reputational concern and highlight the paradoxical nature of social cohesion.

Suggested Citation

  • Huang, Kuan-Ju & Uchida, Yukiko & Takemura, Kosuke & Fukushima, Shintaro & Aida, Jun & Hanazato, Masamichi & Kanamori, Mariko, 2025. "Paradoxical effects of community social cohesion on mental health and help-seeking among older adults: The role of reputation concern and socioeconomic status," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 380(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:380:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625005659
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118234
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625005659
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118234?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:380:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625005659. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.