IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v380y2025ics0277953625005623.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social network intervention to improve blood pressure control after stroke: The TEAMS-BP randomized clinical trial

Author

Listed:
  • Dhand, Amar
  • Crum, Katherine
  • Hanken, Kaitlin E.
  • Bhatkhande, Gauri
  • Luo, Melinda
  • Corbin, Ian M.
  • Usmanov, George
  • Rothfeld-Wehrwein, Zachary
  • Dhongade, Vrushali
  • Lin, David
  • Slocum, Chloe
  • Haff, Nancy
  • Choudhry, Niteesh K.

Abstract

Social connections play an important role in predicting health outcomes after a stroke. In the context of clinical medicine, a social network theory proposes that each patient is embedded in a personal social network of interpersonal connections that provide social support, information, and behavioral cues. However, the effectiveness of activating and harnessing supportive personal social networks remains uncertain, particularly within healthcare situations where individualism prevails. As an initial step towards developing interventions for healthier social networks in clinical practice, we conducted a randomized controlled trial in stroke survivors. This trial compared a network intervention versus individual counseling for 3 months with the aim of lowering blood pressure after stroke. Over 2 years, we recruited 45 stroke survivors, with 24 assigned to the network intervention and 21 to the individual counseling group. Results indicated no significant difference in the primary outcome of absolute systolic blood pressure difference over 3 months between the two groups. However, subgroup analyses revealed that patients within small and close-knit networks, known as high constraint networks, who received the network intervention had a significantly larger reduction in blood pressure than patients within large and open, low constraint, networks. The study's findings are preliminary due to dropout rates in both arms, and variable engagement of network members in the intervention arm. Nevertheless, our results suggest the potential of leveraging social networks to enhance health outcomes in specific subgroups of stroke survivors, highlighting avenues for further research and intervention development. Clinical Trial Unique Identifier: NCT05258890.

Suggested Citation

  • Dhand, Amar & Crum, Katherine & Hanken, Kaitlin E. & Bhatkhande, Gauri & Luo, Melinda & Corbin, Ian M. & Usmanov, George & Rothfeld-Wehrwein, Zachary & Dhongade, Vrushali & Lin, David & Slocum, Chloe , 2025. "Social network intervention to improve blood pressure control after stroke: The TEAMS-BP randomized clinical trial," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 380(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:380:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625005623
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118231
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625005623
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118231?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:380:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625005623. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.