IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v380y2025ics027795362500509x.html

Effects of childhood environments on the discernment of health misinformation

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Si-Qi
  • Li, Ming-Hui
  • Li, Yu-Chu
  • Rao, Li-Lin

Abstract

The wide dissemination of COVID-19 and other health misinformation poses a significant threat to individuals' well-being. We investigated how two key features of childhood environments, uncertainty and harshness, influence individuals’ ability to distinguish COVID-19 and other health-related truths from misinformation (i.e., accuracy discernment and sharing discernment). Across four studies (including two preregistered studies, total N = 4874), we found that greater childhood uncertainty was associated with worse accuracy discernment and sharing discernment, whereas greater childhood harshness was associated with better accuracy discernment. We also found that the associations between childhood environments and discernment were mediated by analytic thinking (Studies 1–3). Furthermore, recalling or imagining uncertain childhood events led to a decrease in sharing discernment (Study 4). These findings offer insight into how childhood environments influence the ability to discern truth from falsehood on social media later in life, which may contribute to the establishment of corresponding interventions to combat the negative impact of misinformation on public health.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Si-Qi & Li, Ming-Hui & Li, Yu-Chu & Rao, Li-Lin, 2025. "Effects of childhood environments on the discernment of health misinformation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 380(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:380:y:2025:i:c:s027795362500509x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118179
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027795362500509X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118179?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shane Frederick, 2005. "Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 19(4), pages 25-42, Fall.
    2. Rebecca Hamilton & Debora Thompson & Sterling Bone & Lan Nguyen Chaplin & Vladas Griskevicius & Kelly Goldsmith & Ronald Hill & Deborah Roedder John & Chiraag Mittal & Thomas O’Guinn & Paul Piff & Car, 2019. "The effects of scarcity on consumer decision journeys," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 532-550, May.
    3. Samuli Laato & A. K. M. Najmul Islam & Muhammad Nazrul Islam & Eoin Whelan, 2020. "What drives unverified information sharing and cyberchondria during the COVID-19 pandemic?," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 288-305, May.
    4. Patrick Bateson & David Barker & Timothy Clutton-Brock & Debal Deb & Bruno D'Udine & Robert A. Foley & Peter Gluckman & Keith Godfrey & Tom Kirkwood & Marta Mirazón Lahr & John McNamara & Neil B. Metc, 2004. "Developmental plasticity and human health," Nature, Nature, vol. 430(6998), pages 419-421, July.
    5. Antonio A. Arechar & Jennifer Allen & Adam J. Berinsky & Rocky Cole & Ziv Epstein & Kiran Garimella & Andrew Gully & Jackson G. Lu & Robert M. Ross & Michael N. Stagnaro & Yunhao Zhang & Gordon Pennyc, 2023. "Understanding and combatting misinformation across 16 countries on six continents," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(9), pages 1502-1513, September.
    6. Trinidad, Jose Eos, 2021. "Social consequences and contexts of adverse childhood experiences," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    7. Pieter Berg & Tom Wenseleers, 2018. "Uncertainty about social interactions leads to the evolution of social heuristics," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-7, December.
    8. Viechtbauer, Wolfgang, 2010. "Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 36(i03).
    9. Nan, Xiaoli & Wang, Yuan & Thier, Kathryn, 2022. "Why do people believe health misinformation and who is at risk? A systematic review of individual differences in susceptibility to health misinformation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    10. Xue, Xiang & Ma, Haiyun & Zhao, Yuxiang (Chris) & Zhu, Qinghua & Song, Shijie, 2024. "Mitigating the influence of message features on health misinformation sharing intention in social media: Experimental evidence for accuracy-nudge intervention," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 356(C).
    11. Gordon Pennycook & Ziv Epstein & Mohsen Mosleh & Antonio A. Arechar & Dean Eckles & David G. Rand, 2021. "Shifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation online," Nature, Nature, vol. 592(7855), pages 590-595, April.
    12. Valdez, Danny & Soto-Vásquez, Arthur D. & Montenegro, María S., 2023. "Geospatial vaccine misinformation risk on social media: Online insights from an English/Spanish natural language processing (NLP) analysis of vaccine-related tweets," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 339(C).
    13. Antonio A. Arechar & Jennifer Allen & Adam J. Berinsky & Rocky Cole & Ziv Epstein & Kiran Garimella & Andrew Gully & Jackson G. Lu & Robert M. Ross & Michael N. Stagnaro & Yunhao Zhang & Gordon Pennyc, 2023. "Author Correction: Understanding and combatting misinformation across 16 countries on six continents," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(10), pages 1797-1797, October.
    14. Shabnam Mousavi & Gerd Gigerenzer, 2017. "Heuristics are Tools for Uncertainty," Homo Oeconomicus: Journal of Behavioral and Institutional Economics, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 361-379, December.
    15. Zheng Zhang & Xuexin Li, 2024. "Does dispositional awe promote customer citizenship behaviours? The multiple mediating effects of construal level and social connectedness," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.
    16. Thomson, Keela S. & Oppenheimer, Daniel M., 2016. "Investigating an alternate form of the cognitive reflection test," Judgment and Decision Making, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(1), pages 99-113, January.
    17. Keela S. Thomson & Daniel M. Oppenheimer, 2016. "Investigating an alternate form of the cognitive reflection test," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 11(1), pages 99-113, January.
    18. Islam, A.K.M. Najmul & Laato, Samuli & Talukder, Shamim & Sutinen, Erkki, 2020. "Misinformation sharing and social media fatigue during COVID-19: An affordance and cognitive load perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    19. Stephen A. Spiller, 2011. "Opportunity Cost Consideration," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 38(4), pages 595-610.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhiming Liu, 2025. "Can shifting attention to accuracy reduce misinformation on social media? A replication and extension in China," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Tiziana Assenza & Alberto Cardaci & Stefanie Huber, 2024. "Fake News: Susceptibility, Awareness, and Solutions," ECONtribute Policy Brief Series 065, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
    3. Sipos, Norbert & Lukovszki, Lívia & Rideg, András & Vörös, Zsófia, 2025. "Önreflexió, döntéshozatal és a vállalkozók affektív jólléte [Cognitive reflectiveness, decision-making, and entrepreneurs affective well-being]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(9), pages 976-991.
    4. Alt, Marius & Bruns, Hendrik & Della Valle, Nives, 2024. "The more the better? Synergies of prosocial interventions and effects on behavioural spillovers," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    5. Comerford, David A., 2025. "Cognitive reflection, arithmetic ability and financial literacy independently predict both inflation expectations and forecast accuracy," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 517-531.
    6. Bago, Bence & Rosenzweig, Leah & Berinsky, Adam & Rand, David, 2021. "Emotion may predict susceptibility to fake news but emotion regulation does not help," IAST Working Papers 21-127, Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse (IAST).
    7. Jan Pfänder & Sacha Altay, 2025. "Spotting false news and doubting true news: a systematic review and meta-analysis of news judgements," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 9(4), pages 688-699, April.
    8. Tobia Spampatti & Ulf J. J. Hahnel & Evelina Trutnevyte & Tobias Brosch, 2024. "Psychological inoculation strategies to fight climate disinformation across 12 countries," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 8(2), pages 380-398, February.
    9. Fossen, Frank M. & Neyse, Levent & Schröder, Carsten, 2025. "Does Cognitive Reflection Relate to Preferences and Socioeconomic Outcomes?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 3(2), pages 303-343.
    10. Tom Buchanan & Rotem Perach & Deborah Husbands & Amber F Tout & Ekaterina Kostyuk & James Kempley & Laura Joyner, 2024. "Individual differences in sharing false political information on social media: Deliberate and accidental sharing, motivations and positive schizotypy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(6), pages 1-37, June.
    11. Brandts, Jordi & Busom, Isabel & Lopez-Mayan, Cristina, 2025. "Do giving voice and social information help in revising a misconception about rent–control?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    12. Estache, Antonio & Foucart, Renaud & Georgalos, Konstantinos, 2025. "Delegating decisions to a lottery can reduce preference for control," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    13. Doğan, Gönül & Kalaycı, Kenan & Man, Priscilla, 2026. "Pyramid schemes," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    14. Takeshi Ojima & Shinsuke Ikeda, 2025. "Commitment To Honesty," ISER Discussion Paper 1295, Institute of Social and Economic Research, The University of Osaka.
    15. Plotkina, Daria & Hoffmann, Arvid O.I. & Roger, Patrick & D’Hondt, Catherine, 2024. "Gender vs. personality: The role of masculinity in explaining cognitive style," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    16. Marek Muszyński & Natalia Banasik-Jemielniak & Tomasz Żółtak & Kaili Rimfeld & Nicholas G. Shakeshaft & Kerry L. Schofield & Margherita Malanchini & Artur Pokropek, 2026. "Moving intelligence measurement online: adaptation and validation of the Polish version of the Pathfinder general cognitive ability test," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 329-354, February.
    17. Fabian Herweg & Svenja Hippel & Daniel Müller & Fabio Römeis, 2024. "Axiom Preferences and Choice Mistakes under Risk," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 326, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
    18. Isabel Busom & Cristina Lopez-Mayan & Judith Panadés & Jordi Brandts, 2022. "Images Say More Than Just Words: Effectiveness of Visual and Text Communication in Dispelling the Rent–Control Misconception," Working Papers 1322, Barcelona School of Economics.
    19. Maya Bar-Hillel & Tom Noah & Shane Frederick, 2019. "Solving stumpers, CRT and CRAT: Are the abilities related?," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 14(5), pages 620-623, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:380:y:2025:i:c:s027795362500509x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.