IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v37y1993i2p263-266.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vasectomy as a reason for donor insemination

Author

Listed:
  • Humphrey, Michael
  • Humphrey, Heather

Abstract

Among 200 couples referred for counselling with a view to donor insemination (DI) were 21 whose request arose from an earlier vasectomy. This had been judged irreversible, apart from one case where the man had been sterilised for genetic reasons and therefore had not sought reversal. An overall incidence of 10.5% indicates that vasectomy may lead to fertility problems in the event of remarriage, which has become more common with an increasing divorce rate. All 21 husbands but only 3 wives had been previously married; 3 former wives had died, otherwise all previous marriages had ended in divorce. Most husbands were considerably older than their second wives, epecially as compared with the majority of men in the larger series who were still in a first marriage. Their relative maturity may have helped them to respond more sensitively to their wives' maternal needs when they already had children of their own. During a follow-up interval of up to 8 years, 2 couples had separated after a brief relationship but 9 of the other 12 contacted had become parents by DI. The 3 remaining couples included a wife who at the latest report was 5 months pregnant, and 2 who were still pursuing treatment. Despite the low failure rate in this small series we should bear in mind that DI is not an ideal solution to the problem of male infertility, nor always even acceptable. Pre-operative banking of semen as a form of insurance against unforeseen circumstances may appeal to some men who have decided on vasectomy, although this facility is neither widely available nor commonly used where it is available.

Suggested Citation

  • Humphrey, Michael & Humphrey, Heather, 1993. "Vasectomy as a reason for donor insemination," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 263-266, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:37:y:1993:i:2:p:263-266
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(93)90460-L
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:37:y:1993:i:2:p:263-266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.