IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v378y2025ics0277953625004770.html

Legal gender recognition and the health of transgender and gender diverse people: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Scheim, Ayden I.
  • Restar, Arjee J.
  • Zubizarreta, Dougie
  • Lucas, Ruby
  • Cole, S. Wilson
  • Everhart, Avery
  • Baker, Kellan E.
  • Rodriguez, Maria I.

Abstract

Legal gender recognition (LGR) refers to laws, policies, and administrative procedures that enable transgender and gender diverse (TGD) people to update their legal identity documents (ID) to reflect their self-determined gender. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the health effects of LGR and a nested scoping review of TGD people's LGR-related values and preferences (PROSPERO CRD42023441769). We searched seven databases through April 19, 2024, and organization websites (for grey literature) through August 2023. The effectiveness review included quantitative studies evaluating the effect of LGR (policies or possession of gender-concordant ID) on seven domains of health and well-being. We conducted random-effects meta-analyses when possible and otherwise used narrative synthesis. Study risk of bias and confidence in the cumulative evidence were assessed using the ROBINS-E and GRADE, respectively. We screened 2748 studies and included 24 in the effectiveness review. In meta-analyses, LGR was associated with less suicidal ideation (OR = 0.75; 95 % CI: 0.56–1.00, I2 = 46 %) and psychological distress (e.g., OR for LGR on all versus no ID = 0.53; 95 % CI: 0.40, 0.70, I2 = 17 %). LGR may reduce anticipated discrimination, increase healthcare utilization, reduce gonadectomies, and improve socio-economic status, but the evidence was very uncertain. We included 31 studies on TGD persons' values and preferences. They perceived well-being benefits of LGR, had diverse personal preferences related to safety, and reported financial and policy barriers to LGR. In conclusion, LGR may improve TGD mental health and is perceived to reduce exposure to stigma and discrimination. Higher-quality effectiveness research is needed on other health and well-being outcomes, as well as research to evaluate specific LGR policy provisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Scheim, Ayden I. & Restar, Arjee J. & Zubizarreta, Dougie & Lucas, Ruby & Cole, S. Wilson & Everhart, Avery & Baker, Kellan E. & Rodriguez, Maria I., 2025. "Legal gender recognition and the health of transgender and gender diverse people: A systematic review and meta-analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 378(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:378:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625004770
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118147
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625004770
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118147?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Petra Meier & Joz Motmans, 2020. "Trans Laws and Constitutional Rulings in Belgium: The Ambiguous Relations between Sex and Gender," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 242-252.
    2. Sofia Aboim, 2020. "Gender in a Box? The Paradoxes of Recognition beyond the Gender Binary," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 231-241.
    3. Mann, Samuel, 2021. "Transgender employment and gender marker laws," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    4. Jonah P. DeChants & Myeshia N. Price & Amy E. Green & Carrie K. Davis & Casey J. Pick, 2022. "Association of Updating Identification Documents with Suicidal Ideation and Attempts among Transgender and Nonbinary Youth," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-9, April.
    5. Petra Meier & Joz Motmans, 2020. "Trans Laws and Constitutional Rulings in Belgium: The Ambiguous Relations between Sex and Gender," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 242-252.
    6. Sofia Aboim, 2020. "Gender in a Box? The Paradoxes of Recognition beyond the Gender Binary," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 231-241.
    7. Matthew J Page & Joanne E McKenzie & Patrick M Bossuyt & Isabelle Boutron & Tammy C Hoffmann & Cynthia D Mulrow & Larissa Shamseer & Jennifer M Tetzlaff & Elie A Akl & Sue E Brennan & Roger Chou & Jul, 2021. "The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(3), pages 1-15, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mieke Verloo & Anna van der Vleuten, 2020. "Trans* Politics: Current Challenges and Contestations Regarding Bodies, Recognition, and Trans* Organising," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 223-230.
    2. Mieke Verloo & Anna van der Vleuten, 2020. "Trans* Politics: Current Challenges and Contestations Regarding Bodies, Recognition, and Trans* Organising," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 223-230.
    3. Boglárka Anna Éliás & Attila Jámbor, 2021. "Food Security and COVID-19: A Systematic Review of the First-Year Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-18, May.
    4. Omoyele, Olalekan & Hoffmann, Maximilian & Koivisto, Matti & Larrañeta, Miguel & Weinand, Jann Michael & Linßen, Jochen & Stolten, Detlef, 2024. "Increasing the resolution of solar and wind time series for energy system modeling: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PB).
    5. Cala, Anggie & Maturana-Córdoba, Aymer & Soto-Verjel, Joseph, 2023. "Exploring the pretreatments' influence on pressure reverse osmosis: PRISMA review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    6. Ming Shan & Yu-Shan Li & Bon-Gang Hwang & Jia-En Chua, 2021. "Productivity Metrics and Its Implementations in Construction Projects: A Case Study of Singapore," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, November.
    7. Susca, T. & Zanghirella, F. & Colasuonno, L. & Del Fatto, V., 2022. "Effect of green wall installation on urban heat island and building energy use: A climate-informed systematic literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    8. Alexander P. L. Martindale & Carrie D. Llewellyn & Richard O. Visser & Benjamin Ng & Victoria Ngai & Aditya U. Kale & Lavinia Ferrante Ruffano & Robert M. Golub & Gary S. Collins & David Moher & Melis, 2024. "Concordance of randomised controlled trials for artificial intelligence interventions with the CONSORT-AI reporting guidelines," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    9. Gizéh Rangel-de Lázaro & Josep M. Duart, 2023. "You Can Handle, You Can Teach It: Systematic Review on the Use of Extended Reality and Artificial Intelligence Technologies for Online Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-23, February.
    10. Ayla Amamou & Safa Chabouh & Lilia Sidhom & Alaeddine Zouari & Abdelkader Mami, 2025. "Agri-Food Supply Chain Sustainability Indicators from a Multi-Capital Perspective: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-34, May.
    11. Kim, Hyunil & Kim, Yun Young & Song, Eun-Jee & Windsor, Liliane, 2024. "Policies to reduce child poverty and child maltreatment: A scoping review and preliminary estimates of indirect effects," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    12. Kofi Awuviry-Newton & Bernadette Saunders & Nestor Asiamah & Kwamina Abekah-Carter & Daniel Doh, 2025. "Adverse childhood experiences and elder abuse victimization nexus: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(2), pages 1-18, February.
    13. Barbu Alexandra, 2025. "Mapping Europe’s Cultural Pulse: A Bibliometric Analysis of Cultural Mega Events, Music Festivals, and the European Capitals of Culture (2000–2025)," Culture. Society. Economy. Politics, Sciendo, vol. 5(2), pages 24-42.
    14. Alexander Samuels & Blessing Takawira, 2024. "A systematic review of the impact of human resource management strategies on green supply chain management practices for achieving strategic objectives," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 13(3), pages 133–150-1, April.
    15. Lee, Kuan-Ting & Chen, Yen-Chin & Yang, Yi-Ching & Wang, Wei-Li, 2024. "On practicing magicine, from wonder to care: A systematic review of studies that apply magic in healthcare," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 341(C).
    16. Yau, Jessie Ho-Yin & Wong, Edwin Lok Yan & Kanagawa, Hotinpo Sky & Liu, Tianyin & Wong, Gloria Hoi Yan & Lum, Terry Yat Sang, 2024. "Effectiveness of community-based participatory research (CBPR) interventions on mental health outcomes: A systematic review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 363(C).
    17. Deniz Dutz & Ingrid Huitfeldt & Santiago Lacouture & Magne Mogstad & Alexander Torgovitsky & Winnie van Dijk, 2021. "Selection in Surveys," NBER Working Papers 29549, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
      • Deniz Dutz & Ingrid Huitfeldt & Santiago Lacouture & Magne Mogstad & Alexander Torgovitsky & Winnie van Dijk, 2021. "Selection in Surveys," Discussion Papers 971, Statistics Norway, Research Department.
    18. Tang, Yuanrong & Kang, Yu & Wang, Yifan & Wang, Tianhong & Zhong, Chen & Gong, Jiangtao, 2026. "A counselor-inspired agent framework for AI counselors to enhance client engagement," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    19. Ellen Busink & Dana Kendzia & Fatih Kircelli & Sophie Boeger & Jovana Petrovic & Helen Smethurst & Stephen Mitchell & Christian Apel, 2023. "A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of renal replacement therapies, and consequences for decision-making in the end-stage renal disease treatment pathway," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 24(3), pages 377-392, April.
    20. Maketo, Lydia & Ashworth, Peta, 2025. "Social acceptance of green hydrogen in European Union and the United Kingdom: A systematic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:378:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625004770. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.