IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v36y1993i3p361-370.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dental care use by U.S. veterans eligible for VA care

Author

Listed:
  • Gilbert, Gregg H.
  • Branch, Laurence G.
  • Longmate, Jeffrey

Abstract

Military veterans eligible for dental care in U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) facilities cooperated for a mailed survey about their dental care utilization. Subjects were selected because of their eligibility for continuing dental care in VA facilities at no monetary cost. However, only 48% reported the VA as their only or primary source of dental care; this allowed us the oppurtunity to compare dental care frequency by those who received dental care at no monetary cost with those who did not, as well as measure delivery system effects on dental care use. Consequently, we tested respondent-level and delivery system-level hypotheses regarding determinants of veterans' dental care use. Predisposing characteristics (dentate status, usual reason for dental visits, and the importance placed on dental care and oral health) were the strongest determinants of interval since last dental visit. Enabling determinants (current source of dental care, and having a regular source of care) were also significant, but measures of need for dental care (perceived oral health and perceived need for treatment) were not. More recent dental care use by veterans who used the VA delivery system as their source of dental care, even with dental care payment source and other determinants accounted for, suggests that the VA delivery system may have promoted more regular use compared to other systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Gilbert, Gregg H. & Branch, Laurence G. & Longmate, Jeffrey, 1993. "Dental care use by U.S. veterans eligible for VA care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 361-370, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:36:y:1993:i:3:p:361-370
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(93)90020-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:36:y:1993:i:3:p:361-370. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.