IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v36y1993i10p1319-1323.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The geographical inequalities of mortality in China

Author

Listed:
  • Ru-Kang, Fang

Abstract

The Chinese population accounts for one-fifth of the world's total, so any change in Chinese mortality will have a great influence on the change of the world population. Before 1949, Chinese population mortality was 25-33%, the high year was 40%, and infant mortality even reached over 250 per 1000 live births. After 1949, the mortality had a rapid decline: it was 20% in 1949, and 14-18% in 1950-1964. But in 1960, mortality went up to 25.43% because of the natural disasters. Since 1965 it has been under 10%. Chinese mortality was 6.58% in 1988. The lowest proportion was 4.95% in Heilongjiang Province. The highest was 7.13% in Yunnan Province. Urban mortality has always been lower than that of the countryside. The urban mortality was 7% in 1965, but it was not until 1978, that countryside mortality had just reached this level. It probably related to the economics, culture, environment, health care and etc. It is worth noting that urban mortality has increased in China since 1981. It was 6.44% in Shanghai in 1981, but it went up to 6.80% in 1988. This condition has been attributed to an aging population and environmental pollution. As family planning has been practised in China, it can be estimated that the Chinese population will be at its height in 2004, and will begin to decrease in 2005.

Suggested Citation

  • Ru-Kang, Fang, 1993. "The geographical inequalities of mortality in China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 1319-1323, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:36:y:1993:i:10:p:1319-1323
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(93)90222-P
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:36:y:1993:i:10:p:1319-1323. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.