IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v369y2025ics0277953625001856.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Medical uncertainty in the shadow of Dobbs: Treating obstetric complications in a new reproductive frontier

Author

Listed:
  • Buchbinder, Mara
  • Arora, Kavita S.
  • McKetchnie, Samantha M.
  • Sabbath, Erika L.

Abstract

Recent changes to United States medical practice following the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v Jackson Woman's Health Organization have led to new forms of medical uncertainty arising from the interpretation and implementation of state law. Post-Dobbs legal restrictions are particularly challenging because they entail multiple forms of uncertainty that intensify when combined, with risks to pregnant patients and to the clinicians who care for them. In this article, we identify and describe three distinct types of uncertainty that obstetrician-gynecologists (OB-GYNs) in states with abortion bans encounter when caring for patients with an obstetric complication known as preterm prelabor (or premature) rupture of membranes (PPROM, i.e., ‘water breaking’). PPROM represents a paradigmatic case in which prognostic, legal, and existential uncertainty coalesce, leading to stress and discomfort for both patients and the clinicians caring for them. Focusing on OB-GYNs, we describe each of these forms of medical uncertainty in turn, and then elaborate a case study to show how they operate in tandem over time. In doing so, we add to a growing body of literature highlighting the relationship between structural conditions shaping medicine and uncertainty in practice. Whereas evidence-based medicine is organized around the logic of reducing uncertainty, we find that doing so is far more difficult when the uncertainty arises from politics as opposed to clinical factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Buchbinder, Mara & Arora, Kavita S. & McKetchnie, Samantha M. & Sabbath, Erika L., 2025. "Medical uncertainty in the shadow of Dobbs: Treating obstetric complications in a new reproductive frontier," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 369(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:369:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625001856
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117856
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625001856
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117856?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kelly, Ann H. & Lezaun, Javier & Löwy, Ilana & Matta, Gustavo Corrêa & de Oliveira Nogueira, Carolina & Rabello, Elaine Teixeira, 2020. "Uncertainty in times of medical emergency: Knowledge gaps and structural ignorance during the Brazilian Zika crisis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    2. Lilly, Anna-Grace & Newman, Isabelle P. & Bjork-James, Sophie, 2024. "Our hands are tied: abortion bans and hesitant medicine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 350(C).
    3. Jenkins, Tania M., 2023. "Physicians as shock absorbers: The system of structural factors driving burnout and dissatisfaction in medicine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 337(C).
    4. Wuest, Joanna & Last, Briana S., 2024. "Agents of scientific uncertainty: Conflicts over evidence and expertise in gender-affirming care bans for minors," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 344(C).
    5. Vailly, Joëlle, 2008. "The expansion of abnormality and the biomedical norm: Neonatal screening, prenatal diagnosis and cystic fibrosis in France," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(12), pages 2532-2543, June.
    6. Stockl, Andrea, 2007. "Complex syndromes, ambivalent diagnosis, and existential uncertainty: The case of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(7), pages 1549-1559, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nelson, Hyeyoung Oh & Lange, Ashlyn & Shah, Maleeha K. & Kibet, Mercy, 2025. "Structural inequities and provider burnout in maternal health in the United States," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 372(C).
    2. Duran, Eduardo, 2021. "Diagnostic slippage: Medical uncertainty and engaged patienthood in the case of atypical disorders," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    3. Chase, Rachel P. & McMahon, Shannon A. & Winch, Peter J., 2015. "Injury careers after blast exposure among combat veterans deployed to Iraq or Afghanistan," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 309-316.
    4. Salvatore Pirri & Valentina Lorenzoni & Gianni Andreozzi & Marta Mosca & Giuseppe Turchetti, 2020. "Topic Modeling and User Network Analysis on Twitter during World Lupus Awareness Day," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-18, July.
    5. Michalec, Barret & Cuddy, Monica M. & Price, Yvonne & Hafferty, Frederic W., 2024. "U.S. physician burnout and the proletarianization of U.S. doctors: A theoretical reframing," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 358(C).
    6. Halcomb, Laura, 2024. "From affordable to accessible: How the pharmaceutical industry transformed patient consumers into charity recipients," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 363(C).
    7. Wenham, Clare & Abagaro, Camila & Arévalo, Amaral & Coast, Ernestina & Corrêa, Sonia & Cuéllar, Katherine & Leone, Tiziana & Valongueiro, Sandra, 2021. "Analysing the intersection between health emergencies and abortion during Zika in Brazil, El Salvador and Colombia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    8. Ana Rosa Linde Arias & Elisa Tristan-Cheever & Grace Furtado & Eduardo Siqueira, 2020. "“Too Much to Ask, Too Much to Handle”: Women’s Coping in Times of Zika," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-12, June.
    9. Shuster, Stef M. & Pfeffer, Carla A. & Kirkland, Anna, 2024. "Introduction to: Unequal care: Trans medicine and health in dangerous times," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 359(C).
    10. Will, Catherine M. & Armstrong, David & Marteau, Theresa M., 2010. "Genetic unexceptionalism: Clinician accounts of genetic testing for familial hypercholesterolaemia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(5), pages 910-917, September.
    11. Croft, Charlotte & Reay, Trish, 2025. "Breaching the professional social contract to drive system innovation: Nurse managers and the emergence of a new professional group," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 373(C).
    12. Karataş, Hicran & Balas, Şener, 2024. "The liminal experience of awaiting for a cadaveric kidney donation: “I would not wish it on even my enemy!”," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 363(C).
    13. Ebeling, Mary, 2011. "'Get with the Program!': Pharmaceutical marketing, symptom checklists and self-diagnosis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(6), pages 825-832, September.
    14. Preis, Heidi & Mahaffey, Brittain & Heiselman, Cassandra & Lobel, Marci, 2020. "Vulnerability and resilience to pandemic-related stress among U.S. women pregnant at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    15. Allen, Dawn & Wainwright, Megan & Hutchinson, Thomas, 2011. "'Non-compliance' as illness management: Hemodialysis patients' descriptions of adversarial patient-clinician interactions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 129-134, July.
    16. Joyce, Kelly & Jeske, Melanie, 2020. "Using autoimmune strategically: Diagnostic lumping, splitting, and the experience of illness," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    17. Tu, Lucy, 2025. "(Mis)Informed decision-making: How U.S. healthcare providers use science to influence pregnancy options counseling," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 370(C).
    18. Vincenzo Pavone & Flor Arias, 2010. "Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing in Spain: beyond the geneticization thesis," Working Papers 1012, Instituto de Políticas y Bienes Públicos (IPP), CSIC.
    19. Rongyang Ma & Zhaohua Deng & Manli Wu, 2020. "Effects of Health Information Dissemination on User Follows and Likes during COVID-19 Outbreak in China: Data and Content Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-21, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:369:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625001856. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.