IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v34y1992i4p383-393.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ends of the line: Diversity among chronic pain centers

Author

Listed:
  • Csordas, Thomas J.
  • Clark, Jack A.

Abstract

Chronic pain may cause an endless search for care for its sufferers, while presenting a persistently intractable problem for physicians and disability administrators faced with an illness that defies both conventional medical thinking and established disability compensation mechanisms. In the past 15 years pain centers have mushroomed. Some pain specialists, who are typically based in these centers, have claimed to provide comprehensive treatment for chronic pain and definitive solutions to problems of disability policy. However, pain control is not yet a unified field. Approaches to treatment vary and the definitions of the objects of treatment, i.e. chronic pain syndromes, differ. This paper describes the lines of diversity which characterize this emerging field of health care through an explanatory, cross-sectional survey of 25 pain treatment facilities operating in a single urban community. Pain centers were found to vary with respect to the following dimensions: institutional affiliation, professional background of the staff, treatment modalities offered, populations served, patient selection criteria, types of pain condition treated, and diagnostic and etiologic frames of reference. Pain centers may present a diverse array of options in a pain sufferer's search for care. In addition, the reliance on pain specialists for a resolution of complex problems of disability policy may be premature.

Suggested Citation

  • Csordas, Thomas J. & Clark, Jack A., 1992. "Ends of the line: Diversity among chronic pain centers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 383-393, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:34:y:1992:i:4:p:383-393
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(92)90298-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:34:y:1992:i:4:p:383-393. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.