IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v34y1992i11p1203-1216.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methodological issues and research strategies in the study of coping with cancer

Author

Listed:
  • Somerfield, Mark
  • Curbow, Barbara

Abstract

We explore methodological issues and research strategies and applications in the study of coping with cancer. The major points are addressed within the context of the transactional, or process, model of stress and coping offered by Lazarus and Folkman. Three features of this model are discussed: (a) a focus on what individuals are actually doing and thinking in stressful transactions as opposed to what they usually do or would do; (b) an emphasis on assessing coping behavior in relation to a specific context and; (c) attention to the dynamic nature of coping behavior. We outline each of these three features and discuss its implications for research on coping with cancer; particular attention is given to specific measurement strategies and substantive research questions.We also consider the utility of research on coping with cancer for the design and implementation of coping interventions for individuals with cancer.

Suggested Citation

  • Somerfield, Mark & Curbow, Barbara, 1992. "Methodological issues and research strategies in the study of coping with cancer," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 34(11), pages 1203-1216, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:34:y:1992:i:11:p:1203-1216
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(92)90313-F
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    neoplasms coping methodology;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:34:y:1992:i:11:p:1203-1216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.