IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v33y1991i9p1071-1080.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychological sequelae of infertility treatment: The role of gender and sex-role identification

Author

Listed:
  • Berg, Barbara J.
  • Wilson, John F.
  • Weingartner, Paul J.

Abstract

Infertility has traditionally been viewed as a female problem and women have been expected to suffer greater psychological distress due to infertility. This paper investigates the nature of gender differences and sex-role identification in the psychological sequelae associated with infertility treatment. The expectation that infertile women experience higher distress levels than men was not supported by these data. No gender differences were observed in either the level of emotional strain, marital adjustment, or sexual satisfaction for the 104 couples studied. However, gender differences were apparent in factors associated with psychological distress, suggesting that while the level of strain might be comparable, the experience of infertility is different for men and women. Sex-role identification was found to have a greater relationship to the indices of distress than gender. Masculinity was associated with lower emotional strain and greater marital satisfaction for both genders and enhanced sexual satisfaction for men. Femininity was related to enhanced marital and sexual satisfaction for both genders. Gender differences and sex-role identification are discussed in the context of the unique experience of infertility.

Suggested Citation

  • Berg, Barbara J. & Wilson, John F. & Weingartner, Paul J., 1991. "Psychological sequelae of infertility treatment: The role of gender and sex-role identification," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 33(9), pages 1071-1080, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:33:y:1991:i:9:p:1071-1080
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(91)90012-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:33:y:1991:i:9:p:1071-1080. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.