IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v33y1991i7p795-800.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of employment and its correlates on spontaneous abortion risk

Author

Listed:
  • Bryant, Heather E.
  • Love, Edgar J.

Abstract

While several studies have examined the role of employment during pregnancy on reproductive risk, few have taken into account the potential selection pressures which may cause a woman to choose employment or non-employment during pregnancy. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that employment, or certain types or preconditions of employment, places a woman at increased risk for spontaneous abortion. A case-control study design, utilizing two control groups matched to the 334 cases for age and parity (total N = 981) allowed detailed comparisons of exposures and correlates during the index pregnancy. Control groups consisted of pregnant women (less than 25 wk gestation) and postnatal women. Detailed histories of employment in the 3 months preceding and 4 months following the last menstrual period (LMP), were taken, as well as data on such potential confounding variables as past obstetrical history and socioeconomic status. No significant differences were found between groups in terms of overall employment status. In addition, particular characteristics of jobs, such as hours worked per week, physical activity level, shift work of flexibility of hours were found to be non-significant when analyzed several ways. However, a marked difference in risk (OR for prenatal comparison 1.79, P

Suggested Citation

  • Bryant, Heather E. & Love, Edgar J., 1991. "Effect of employment and its correlates on spontaneous abortion risk," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 33(7), pages 795-800, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:33:y:1991:i:7:p:795-800
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(91)90383-N
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:33:y:1991:i:7:p:795-800. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.