IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v33y1991i3p275-282.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effects of cimetidine on the cost of ulcer disease in Sweden

Author

Listed:
  • Jönsson, Bengt
  • Carlsson, Per

Abstract

The economic impact of the drug cimetidine on the direct and indirect costs of ulcer disease was studied. Cimetidine appeared on the Swedish market in 1978. Unlike other innovations, whose spread is normally slow during the initial period, cimetidine was introduced very swiftly and its use quickly expanded. It was expected that it would reduce the number of elective ulcer operations, with resulting savings in medical care resources exceeding the cost of the new drug. The use of cimetidine was also expected to reduce the indirect costs related to short- and long-term illness. The aims of the study were: (1) to describe and calculate the economic impact of the introduction of cimetidine; (2) to compare the retrospective calculations with the prospective calculations; and (3) to investigate how routinely collected data could serve as a complement to studies of efficacy, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness. Retrospective calculation of the economic effects shows that cimetidine has in fact increased the direct costs of medical care. On the other hand, the drop in indirect costs due to reduced long-term absence (disability) from work, and reduced short-term absence from work, exceeded the increase in the cost of medical care. Thus, the total economic cost of peptic ulcer disease was reduced.

Suggested Citation

  • Jönsson, Bengt & Carlsson, Per, 1991. "The effects of cimetidine on the cost of ulcer disease in Sweden," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 275-282, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:33:y:1991:i:3:p:275-282
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(91)90361-F
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:33:y:1991:i:3:p:275-282. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.