IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v33y1991i3p257-267.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social network, social support and acute chest complaints among young and middle-aged patients in an emergency department--A case-control study

Author

Listed:
  • Östergren, P.-O.
  • Hanson, B.S.
  • Isacsson, S.-O.
  • Tejler, L.

Abstract

The risk of developing non-specific chest complaints was higher among young and middle-aged persons with a weak social network and low social support, when comparing cases with controls at a hospital emergency department (ED). The study was comprised of 62 cases; two different control groups were recruited from other patients at the medical ED (n = 67) and from patients at the surgical ED with urolithiasis or cholecystitis (n = 31). Relative risks for non-specific chest complaints were 2.3-3.4 for patients with a low score on two of the social network factors (an overall index and social anchorage) and two social support factors (emotional esteem support and support by a confidant). These results could be used for developing guidelines for a more adequate clinical management of these patients, as well as for the prevention of stress-related conditions in general. An analysis was made of the conceptual validity of the instrument used for assessing social network and social support. It was concluded that structural elements, such as social network factors, represented a more valid measurement that was less affected by subjectivity. Future research is of importance for finding overbridging concepts, rather than to further continue the dissection of presently used indices into even more 'specific' variables.

Suggested Citation

  • Östergren, P.-O. & Hanson, B.S. & Isacsson, S.-O. & Tejler, L., 1991. "Social network, social support and acute chest complaints among young and middle-aged patients in an emergency department--A case-control study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 257-267, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:33:y:1991:i:3:p:257-267
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(91)90359-K
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:33:y:1991:i:3:p:257-267. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.