IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v33y1991i11p1303-1308.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reliability of questionnaire responses as compared with interview in the elderly: Views of the outcome of transurethral resection of the prostate

Author

Listed:
  • Doll, Helen
  • McPherson, Klim
  • Davies, Jane
  • Flood, Ann
  • Smith, Joe
  • Williams, Grant
  • Ginzler, Maria
  • Petticrew, Mark
  • Black, Nick

Abstract

Three hundred and eighty-eightmen undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hypertrophy completed a presurgical questionnaire and three follow-up questionnaires 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery. The questionnaires covered details of prostatic symptoms, general health, and expectations and results of surgery. At each follow-up point 40 randomly selected patients were interviewed by two female research assistants. The response rate to the questionnaires was over 90% at each follow-up point while that for the interviews was lower at around 80%. We examine the reliability of the postal questionnaires in assessing health status by comparing questionnaire and interview responses, with a view to the wider employment of such a method in the follow-up of surgical patients. In general, and as reported elsewhere, responses to questions on easily defined topics are highly comparable between questionnaire and interview. Responses to more subjective questions are moderately reliable, but with a tendency for postal questionnaires to underestimate a patient's health problems. It is difficult to assess the reliability of the questionnaires with regard to questions of an intimate nature since such questions caused embarrassment during interview with consequent incomplete responses.

Suggested Citation

  • Doll, Helen & McPherson, Klim & Davies, Jane & Flood, Ann & Smith, Joe & Williams, Grant & Ginzler, Maria & Petticrew, Mark & Black, Nick, 1991. "Reliability of questionnaire responses as compared with interview in the elderly: Views of the outcome of transurethral resection of the prostate," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 33(11), pages 1303-1308, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:33:y:1991:i:11:p:1303-1308
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(91)90079-R
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:33:y:1991:i:11:p:1303-1308. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.