Author
Listed:
- Poerksen, Anja
- Petitti, Diana B.
Abstract
Recent studies have not shown adverse effects of employment during pregnancy on the pregnancy outcome, but most have not successfully distinguished factors due to work-related physical and mental strain from differences in social, economic and cultural characteristics between employed and non-employed women. We analyzed data from the Alameda County Case-Control Study of Low Birth Weight to address the question of employment as a risk factor for low birth weight in more depth. Subjects in the study were singleton infants without congenital malformations born in 1987 to black or white, non-hispanic residents of Alameda County, a large urban community in California. Cases were all infants weighing less than 2500 g at birth; controls were chosen at random from the infants weighing 3000 g or more. The mothers of 377 black cases, 389 black controls, 233 white cases and 239 white controls could be located and interviewed. This analysis excluded the white women because evidence of response bias in regard to employment was found for them but not for black women. The percentage of black women in the study who were employed during pregnancy was 49.9%. Employment was associated with a significantly lower relative risk of low birth weight before and after controlling for age, parity, smoking, heavy alcohol use, prior low birth weight infants and low pre-pregnancy weight. After adjustment for known risk factors foe low birth weight, employment explained more of the variance of low birth weight than other commonly used measures of 'social class', including income, education and marital status. Employment had a beneficial association with low birth weight for each of three levels of socioeconomic status as measured by a combined education and income scale. The results suggest that the association of employment with a better birth weight outcome acts outside of measured changes in risk behavior of pregnant women at the work place and is independent of socioeconomic status. The study did not determine whether this association is due to self-selection of low risk women into the work force or whether employment itself has a beneficial effect on the pregnant women and her infant. Studies of work related-fatigue and occupational hazards must take the beneficial, independent association of employment with low birth weight into account. Determining whether interventions that increase employment in pregnant women cause better pregnancy outcome has important implications for social welfare and public health policy.
Suggested Citation
Poerksen, Anja & Petitti, Diana B., 1991.
"Employment and low birth weight in black women,"
Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 33(11), pages 1281-1286, January.
Handle:
RePEc:eee:socmed:v:33:y:1991:i:11:p:1281-1286
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:33:y:1991:i:11:p:1281-1286. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.