Author
Listed:
- Duffee, Bram
- Willis, David Blake
Abstract
The time from when an ambulance paramedic receives the 911 alarm notification until they have determined the differential diagnosis of a patient is highly stressful. During this time, there is a high demand placed on the paramedic, and they have a low level of control. Recent advances in prehospital care that place more responsibility on paramedics have exacerbated this high-stress phenomenon. Twenty paramedics from across the United States were interviewed and evaluated using descriptive phenomenology to better understand one of the most stressful moments of high-stakes decision-making that paramedics regularly face. Using descriptive phenomenology, we identified six categories in the paramedics' interview responses: pressure, overwhelm, emotional extremes (with sub-categories of adrenaline rush and time-dilation), dissociation, multi-tasking, and disconnect. This analysis of the paramedic's lived experience of this high-stress, high-stakes phenomenon provides insight into how paramedics experience the unique stress of this phenomenon. This understanding is key to elucidating the effects of this acute stress that may impact the judgment and, ultimately, the care performed by the paramedic. Both early- and late-career paramedics from thirteen different states in all regions of the United States were interviewed. Further qualitative data from paramedics from a diverse range of regions and backgrounds are essential to identify ways in which to ameliorate the negative effects of acute stress experienced by paramedics. Addressing such issues will reduce turnover and burnout among paramedics.
Suggested Citation
Duffee, Bram & Willis, David Blake, 2023.
"Paramedic perspectives of job stress: Qualitative analysis of high-stress, high-stakes emergency medical situations,"
Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 333(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:socmed:v:333:y:2023:i:c:s0277953623005348
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116177
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:333:y:2023:i:c:s0277953623005348. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.