IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v331y2023ics0277953623004057.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Will the implementation process for goal-oriented primary care succeed? A qualitative study investigating five perceived attributes of goal-oriented care

Author

Listed:
  • Huybrechts, Ine
  • Declercq, Anja
  • Verté, Emily
  • Boeckxstaens, Pauline
  • Raeymaeckers, Peter
  • Anthierens, Sibyl

Abstract

Throughout the western world, goal oriented care (GOC) is increasingly promoted as a strategy towards more person-centered, integrated care. The implementation of goal-oriented care not only takes place at the micro-level with individual primary care providers (PCPs) changing their approach, but also requires meso- and macro-level investment. In this study, we zoom in on experiences and actions of various meso- and macro-level actors that are actively engaged with implementing GOC, both within their organization or at the policy level. In-depth interviews were conducted with n = 23 actors from a variety of different organizations (governmental institutions, provider organizations, patient organizations, health/social care organizations, primary care zones/care councils, etc.), using a semi- interview guide inspired by realist interviewing. Three main drivers for implementation were identified: recognition, commitment and coordination. On top of that, results were interpreted through Rogers’ Diffusion of Innovations (Dol) theory in which five attributes are discussed that contribute to or hinder implementation success. Our findings can help define actions to support and facilitate the implementation process of an innovation such as GOC.

Suggested Citation

  • Huybrechts, Ine & Declercq, Anja & Verté, Emily & Boeckxstaens, Pauline & Raeymaeckers, Peter & Anthierens, Sibyl, 2023. "Will the implementation process for goal-oriented primary care succeed? A qualitative study investigating five perceived attributes of goal-oriented care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 331(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:331:y:2023:i:c:s0277953623004057
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116048
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953623004057
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116048?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:331:y:2023:i:c:s0277953623004057. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.