IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v32y1991i7p767-771.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Age and the operationalization of social support

Author

Listed:
  • Olsen, Ole
  • Iversen, Lars
  • Sabroe, Svend

Abstract

In most studies social network is operationalized without any consideration of age. But it is to be expected that both the prevalence and the impact on health of the various sources of social support change through life. If this is true, then the use of a global index may lead to distorted results regarding age changes of the social network. In a cross-sectional study of 1500 occupationally active, Danish men aged 16-74, the hypothesized age dependencies were studied with health operationalized as psychological well-being and social support divided into support from wife, children, family and friends. The prevalence of support from the wife increased with age, whereas her impact on health was only significantly positive in the age range 30-49. Support from family and friends was most prevalent among the youngest, but it had a positive impact on health both among the young and the old. The results regarding impact on health are corroborated by two other studies on mortality. These findings point to methodological errors that may distort results when global network measures are used irrespective of the ages of the participants studied.

Suggested Citation

  • Olsen, Ole & Iversen, Lars & Sabroe, Svend, 1991. "Age and the operationalization of social support," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 767-771, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:32:y:1991:i:7:p:767-771
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(91)90302-S
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:32:y:1991:i:7:p:767-771. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.