IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v32y1991i5p525-534.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance and state changes during the menstrual cycle, conceptualised within a broad band testing framework

Author

Listed:
  • Ussher, J. M.
  • Wilding, J. M.

Abstract

Using a broad band testing framework, indices of performance and state were examined in 10 women during one menstrual cycle, over six separate testing sessions. Indices of state were heart rate, the Cruickshank self-report questionnaire and time to basal skin potential. Results showed that self reported arousal was increased premenstrually. There was dissociation between indices of state, supporting the contention that simple models of arousal are inadequate. Performance tests of cognitive processing, tracking skill, reaction time and vigilance, dual task, speed and accuracy, and short term memory capacity showed only one significant result: semantic processing on a word matching task improved premenstrually. There was no significant relationship between state and performance: with high individual differences found between subjects. It was concluded that menstruation was not acting as a stressor for these subjects, and that there was no evidence for a decrement in performance in the menstrual or premenstrual phases of the cycle. Results are discussed in terms of coping with perceived increase in demand premenstrually, resulting in utilisation of compensatory effort and it is suggested that future work should examine womens ability to cope with perceived increase in demand and attribution of arousal during the menstrual cycle. The implications of the findings in terms of the critique of PMS as a valid construct are discussed, and it is concluded that future work should be carried out within an integrated multi-variate framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Ussher, J. M. & Wilding, J. M., 1991. "Performance and state changes during the menstrual cycle, conceptualised within a broad band testing framework," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 525-534, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:32:y:1991:i:5:p:525-534
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(91)90286-L
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:32:y:1991:i:5:p:525-534. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.