IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v32y1991i4p491-497.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The service system at the crossroad of demography and policy making-- Implications for the elderly

Author

Listed:
  • Andersson, Lars

Abstract

In many countries today, there is an ongoing debate regarding health in 'crisis'. Each country seems to experience a crisis regardless of the level of expenditures in the field of social and health services. This article discusses different influences that affect social and health service systems in relation to the elderly, and brings up the controversy concerning the elderly as a threat to available resources in society. Most examples are based on Swedish sources, but some American and British sources are used as well. Borrowing from the age stratification model, the concepts role and cohort are used as analytical concepts. The role concept is discussed in relation to the development of organizations for retired people. The analysis offered little support for the thesis that the elderly would attain a power position. Thus, a demand for societal resources by means of political strength is less feasible. When looking at the elderly from the cohort perspective, the article includes a discussion of the interdependent forms of care for the elderly; self-care, informal care and formal care. Although great challenges await social and health services systems in this respect, the article concludes that any possible crisis in health and social service systems is socially constructed and not a deterministic effect of demography as such.

Suggested Citation

  • Andersson, Lars, 1991. "The service system at the crossroad of demography and policy making-- Implications for the elderly," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 491-497, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:32:y:1991:i:4:p:491-497
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(91)90352-D
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:32:y:1991:i:4:p:491-497. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.