IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v32y1991i3p249-259.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can intensive campaigns dynamize front line health services? The evaluation of an immunization campaign in thiès health district, Senegal

Author

Listed:
  • Unger, J. -P.

Abstract

With the aid of UNICEF, Senegal has implemented an intensive national vaccination campaign, the first phase of which extended over 4.5 months in 1986 and 1987, the second and third phases being held exactly 1 and 2 years later. The present article evaluates its effects in Thiès health district. It seeks to establish - whether the objectives of the campaign were achieved and maintained beyond the intensive phase; - whether the organization of the campaign was appropriate and did dynamize the first-line health services. The low sustainability, the interference with other activities of the services and some technical deficiencies are shown. They are related to the managerial characteristics of an intensive campaign. The conclusions of this evaluation question (1) the possibility of developing basic health services under one or two programs, (2) the appropriateness of 'Universal Child Immunization in 1990' and (3) the value of accelerating immunization activities when no epidemics occur. Two types of alternatives are suggested: technical options to improve UCI sustainability, and a reorientation of health policy that advocates district management and the administrative as well as operational integration of vertical programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Unger, J. -P., 1991. "Can intensive campaigns dynamize front line health services? The evaluation of an immunization campaign in thiès health district, Senegal," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 249-259, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:32:y:1991:i:3:p:249-259
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(91)90101-H
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:32:y:1991:i:3:p:249-259. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.