IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v32y1991i2p229-232.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dental students' treatment of anxious patients

Author

Listed:
  • O'Shea, Robert M.
  • Mendola, Pauline
  • Corah, Norman L.

Abstract

Patients' anxiousness over treatment is an important factor in the utilization, delivery, and outcome of health care. Patient anxiety over dental treatment is widespread and is a source of stress for both patients and dentists. This paper reports a study of how dental students cope with fearful patients they treat during training, and what tactics they believe are effective. Two classes of senior dental students at a state university (n = 127) completed a brief questionnaire that asked them to describe what they had done in a previous encounter with a nervous patient, and to assess the effect of their actions. Students estimated that almost a quarter of their patients were anxious; most believed that they themselves were made nervous by such patients. Virtually all were committed to using talk plus local anesthesia rather than more extensive, drug-oriented methods. The coping repertoire was extensive. Giving reassurance was the most prominent tactic, followed by providing information about the procedure; expressing empathy or identifying patient feelings and the source of fear; and presenting a calm manner. Most students believed their actions had at least some positive, if not a dramatic, effect. In rating the effectiveness of 10 actions a dentist can take to deal with patient anxiety, the large majority of students rated every behavior as being at least somewhat effective. The behaviors rated 'very effective' by half of more of the students included having a calm manner, demonstrating that what the patient says is taken seriously, being friendly, making the patient feel welcome, and giving moral support during the procedure.

Suggested Citation

  • O'Shea, Robert M. & Mendola, Pauline & Corah, Norman L., 1991. "Dental students' treatment of anxious patients," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 229-232, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:32:y:1991:i:2:p:229-232
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(91)90064-J
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:32:y:1991:i:2:p:229-232. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.