IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v32y1991i2p117-126.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The quest for wholeness: Health care strategies among the residents of council-built hostels in cape town

Author

Listed:
  • Heap, Marion
  • Ramphele, Mamphela

Abstract

The 1980s in South Africa have witnessed an extraordinary interest by health care professionals in the relevance of health care and healing systems outside the dominant biomedical system. The debate centres around the most effective way of incorporating "these other forms" of healing into the dominant system in the best interest of the patient. It is essentially a debate amongst professionals based on their perceptions of "the best interest" without any significant input from the "patients" who are the object of their concern. This paper attempts to bring into focus "patients" perceptions of different health care systems, their access to them and the rationale behind their choice of therapy. The experience of acute symptoms, especially pain, identifies an illness episode and initiates therapeutic action. Biomedical services are, most often, the first choice of the hostel dwellers. Hostel dwellers, although poor, are often prepared to pay for the services of the private biomedical practitioner. In some cases they have no other biomedical option, the lengthy delays encountered at the local government hospitals and clinics are costly for poorly paid unskilled labourers. The local government services, unlike the private practitioner, are not available at times convenient to working people.

Suggested Citation

  • Heap, Marion & Ramphele, Mamphela, 1991. "The quest for wholeness: Health care strategies among the residents of council-built hostels in cape town," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 117-126, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:32:y:1991:i:2:p:117-126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(91)90051-D
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:32:y:1991:i:2:p:117-126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.