IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v32y1991i12p1425-1433.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Maternal role of clerical workers: A feminist analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Stevens, Patricia E.
  • Meleis, Afaf Ibrahim

Abstract

This paper presents the qualitative findings about women's maternal role from an interview study of role integration and health in a U.S. sample of 87 women clerical workers. The data draws from clerical women's perceptions of the satisfactions and stresses they experience in their roles as mothers, the coping strategies they use, and the resources available to them. The analysis provided is based on participants' descriptions of their subjective experiences as mothers within the larger context of managing domestic responsibilities and fulltime jobs outside their homes. Results suggest that women in clerical jobs find many aspects of their maternal role satisfying, like participating in their children's growth, nurturing them, receiving unconditional love, and finding companionship. However, they identify multiple and pervasive stresses including boundless worries, strained relationships, overload, child care problems, and financial burdens. Many of their coping strategies are solitary in nature, although they also engage in active problem-solving, especially when they have to juggle child care and occupational responsinilities. Many do not view their spouses as sources of emotional and tangible support in childrearing. In addition to an in-depth discussion of qualitative findings, the authors examine implications for social policy, intervention, and future research about multiple roles and health.

Suggested Citation

  • Stevens, Patricia E. & Meleis, Afaf Ibrahim, 1991. "Maternal role of clerical workers: A feminist analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 32(12), pages 1425-1433, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:32:y:1991:i:12:p:1425-1433
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(91)90204-P
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:32:y:1991:i:12:p:1425-1433. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.