IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v32y1991i12p1319-1326.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Guineaworm control case study: Planning a multi-strategy approach

Author

Listed:
  • Brieger, William R.
  • Ramakrishna, Jayashree
  • Adeniyi, Joshua D.
  • Sridhar, M. K. C.
  • Kale, Oladele O.

Abstract

The planned global eradication of guineaworm (dracunculiasis) offers opportunities to learn about relatively complicated disease control situations. Unlike smallpox, which was eradicated over 10 years ago through immunization, the guineaworm problem has no one solution, but must rely on a variety of technologies to protect, treat or replace existing unsafe community water supplies which harbour the disease. Experiences in rural Nigeria have shown that a multi-strategy approach is necessary to account for differences in geographical settlement patterns, local culture and beliefs, geology of the area, economy of the villages and political clout of town leaders among the five major segments of the community. Through a self-help primary health care programme, residents of the Idere community were able to dig wells, produce and distribute cloth water filters bringing a reduction in disease incidence in some areas. It was also seen that generally low standards of living exacerbated by scattered outlying settlements made self-help difficult. Unfortunately occasional government and private efforts did not succeed because of a lack of community participation. Programme planners must involve the consumers in diagnosing these community characteristics and in planning, supervising and maintaining the resulting projects. The multi-strategy approach will help avoid wasted resources and false expectations that arise when project staff attempt to apply a "magic bullet" solution to a complex problem.

Suggested Citation

  • Brieger, William R. & Ramakrishna, Jayashree & Adeniyi, Joshua D. & Sridhar, M. K. C. & Kale, Oladele O., 1991. "Guineaworm control case study: Planning a multi-strategy approach," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 32(12), pages 1319-1326, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:32:y:1991:i:12:p:1319-1326
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(91)90191-E
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:32:y:1991:i:12:p:1319-1326. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.