IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v32y1991i11p1263-1268.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relationships among and demographic predictors of dentists' self-reported adherence to national guidelines

Author

Listed:
  • Dorsey, Maureen
  • Overman, Pamela
  • Hayden, William J.
  • Mayberry, William
  • Requa-Clark, Barbara
  • Krust, Kimberly

Abstract

How dentists learn about and integrate new procedures and techniques into dental practice are major concerns in innovation research in dentistry. The purposes of this study were to: (1) develop reliable measures of self-reported adherence to different national guidelines; (2) to examine the relationships among the different measures; and (3) to determine if predictors of these adherence behaviours exist. One thousand U.S. general dentists were asked to complete a survey of adherence behaviors to established guidelines in infection control, radiation protection, and antibiotic prophylaxis. Thirty-five percent responded to the mailed survey. Reliable scales were developed in infection control and antibiotic prophylaxis behaviors. Step-wise multiple regression analysis produced several weak predictors of adherence to guidelines in these two areas. Characteristics of early adopters such as office complexity, membership in professional associations, and year of graduation, were consistent with other dental innovation literature. Significant correlations were found between adherence behaviors in infection control and antibiotic prophylaxis. These correlations do support the findings that practitioners who are early adopters of innovation are likely to do so in more than one area.

Suggested Citation

  • Dorsey, Maureen & Overman, Pamela & Hayden, William J. & Mayberry, William & Requa-Clark, Barbara & Krust, Kimberly, 1991. "Relationships among and demographic predictors of dentists' self-reported adherence to national guidelines," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 32(11), pages 1263-1268, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:32:y:1991:i:11:p:1263-1268
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(91)90041-A
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:32:y:1991:i:11:p:1263-1268. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.