IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v32y1991i11p1245-1255.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring knowledge of cancer

Author

Listed:
  • Berman, Steven H.
  • Wandersman, Abraham

Abstract

At best, most individuals are able to recount two to three of the seven warning signs of cancer [1]. However, this finding is primarily based on free recall of symptoms personally experienced by the respondent. In the present study, a new approach is introduced as an alternative to traditional assessment of knowledge of cancer warning signs. The Knowledge of Cancer Warning Signs Inventory (KCWSI) is a 25 item self-report questionnaire which yields three scores concerning probability judgments about symptoms: basic recognition of the seven warning signs (BRCWS), the extent to which nonwarning signs are perceived to be warning signs (NSPWS), and the extent to which one can accurately discriminate between real and false positive warning signs (accurate knowledge of cancer: AKC). The KCWSI was given to a population who live in a community facing a perceived toxic waste hazard, based on the hypothesis that such a group should be cognizant of the warning signs of cancer because of the serious health threats posed by toxic exposure and the presumed need to engage in greater health preventative activities when living with such an environmental threat. Results show that basic knowledge of the seven cancer warning signs is predicted by AKC, fear of cancer, and a family history of cancer. Misperception of common distress symptoms (of anxiety, somatization, and depression) as symptoms of cancer (nonwarning signs perceived as warning signs: NSPWS) is predicted by fear of cancer, a composite scale of perceived susceptibility to cancer and other health-related problems, Global Symptom Distress, and higher order interactions among the demographic variables of race, gender, income and education. Accurate Knowledge of Cancer (AKC) is associated with lower fear of cancer and lower psychological distress than the other two knowledge measures. The Knowledge of Cancer Warning Signs Inventory yields complex information about how symptoms are perceived and may prove superior to other methods in understanding what people believe about the warning signs of cancer and how this understanding relates to health care behaviors. This study also illustrates the need to pay attention to how health information is measured.

Suggested Citation

  • Berman, Steven H. & Wandersman, Abraham, 1991. "Measuring knowledge of cancer," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 32(11), pages 1245-1255, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:32:y:1991:i:11:p:1245-1255
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(91)90039-F
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:32:y:1991:i:11:p:1245-1255. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.