IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v31y1990i5p557-563.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Emergency department utilization by two subcultures in the same geographical region

Author

Listed:
  • Carmel, Sara
  • Anson, Ofra
  • Levin, Mordechai

Abstract

An exploratory study of emergency department (ED) utilization, comparing Israeli adult Jews and Bedouin Arabs was conducted. The data interpretation derived from the premise that health services utilization reflects not only morbidity patterns but characteristics of both subcultures and the structure of health services. The Bedouins in the study are a Moslem traditional society going through a rapid process of urbanization and modernization, with a relative deficiency in primary health services. Data were collected from the general ED admissions registry. Patients (17 +) who arrived at the ED during the first week of every even month of one calendar year were selected for this study (6815 Jews and 583 Bedouins). The findings indicate that, in general Bedouins use the ED significantly less than Jews. They adjust to the structure of the ED services and use them, more than Jews, as a primary service. Yet, the hospitalization rates of the two populations are similar. In both subcultures the pattern of gender differences changes after the age of 45. The change, however, is in the opposite direction. Differences in ED usage among Bedouin age-sex groups are discussed in terms of changes in social status during a period of socio-cultural transition.

Suggested Citation

  • Carmel, Sara & Anson, Ofra & Levin, Mordechai, 1990. "Emergency department utilization by two subcultures in the same geographical region," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 557-563, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:31:y:1990:i:5:p:557-563
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(90)90091-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:31:y:1990:i:5:p:557-563. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.