IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v31y1990i11p1213-1217.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Winter-summer differences in the effects of emotion, posture and place of measurement on blood pressure

Author

Listed:
  • James, Gary D.
  • Yee, Lily S.
  • Pickering, Thomas G.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess whether the effects of emotional state, posture, situation of measurement, and sex on daily blood pressure variation were different in subjects measured during summer months (May-September) and winter months (November-March). The subjects of the study were 157 patients from the Hypertension Center of New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center in New York, who had ambulatory blood pressure monitoring performed between February 1984 and April 1985. Individual pressures taken with the monitor over the day in each subject were transformed to z-scores using the subject's daily mean pressure and standard deviation in order to assess differences in intraindividual variation. The z-scores were examined in separate but identical analyses of variance models (one for the winter months and one for the summer months) which included emotional state (happy, angry, anxious), posture (sitting, standing), situation of measurement (home, work, elsewhere) and sex as factors. The results showed that more factors had greater effects (as reflected in R2) on blood pressure during the winter months than summer months. In particular, the relative effect of anxiety, sitting, and being at work or home on blood pressure was significantly greater (P

Suggested Citation

  • James, Gary D. & Yee, Lily S. & Pickering, Thomas G., 1990. "Winter-summer differences in the effects of emotion, posture and place of measurement on blood pressure," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 31(11), pages 1213-1217, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:31:y:1990:i:11:p:1213-1217
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(90)90126-D
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:31:y:1990:i:11:p:1213-1217. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.