IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v30y1990i7p819-828.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Flat on your back or back to your flat? Sources of increased hospital services utilization among the elderly in British Columbia

Author

Listed:
  • Hertzman, C.
  • Pulcins, I. R.
  • Barer, M. L.
  • Evans, R. G.
  • Anderson, G. M.
  • Lomas, J.

Abstract

Between 1969 and 1985, the British Columbia hospital system allocated an increasing proportion of the province's total hospital days to elderly patients who stayed for 60 days or more. By 1985/86, long stay patients accounted for almost 50% of all days. In this paper, we explore the diagnoses which contributed the greatest number of patient days of increase among the elderly as a first step in evaluating the appropriateness of this response to the pressures of an aging population. Patient days of increase were not distributed smoothly across a large number of diagnoses, but could be explained by a small number of chronic conditions. Most important were conditions related to senility and senile dementia, the chronic sequelae of heart disease and stroke, and persons awaiting admission to adequate facilities elsewhere. Eighty percent of the increases were seen in extended care and rehabilitation beds and 20% in acute care beds. Seventy-seven percent of the increased patient days were attributable to females and only 23% to males. Since the major sources of increase in patient days were not related to conditions for which new, effective hospital care modalities are available, they call into question the appropriateness of the system's response to the health care needs of the elderly population.

Suggested Citation

  • Hertzman, C. & Pulcins, I. R. & Barer, M. L. & Evans, R. G. & Anderson, G. M. & Lomas, J., 1990. "Flat on your back or back to your flat? Sources of increased hospital services utilization among the elderly in British Columbia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 30(7), pages 819-828, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:30:y:1990:i:7:p:819-828
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(90)90206-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:30:y:1990:i:7:p:819-828. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.