IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v30y1990i4p509-515.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Long-term patterns of general practice consulting behaviour: A qualitative 9-year analysis of general practice histories of a working-aged rural Finnish population

Author

Listed:
  • Kokko, Simo J.

Abstract

The 9-year practice histories of 100 working-aged residents of the rural municipality of Kaavi in Finland were analysed. Based upon an analysis of these histories, an interview of the 81% who participated and the personal patient knowledge of the author from his work as a general practitioner for 7 years in the community, 78% of the persons studied could be classified into six categories in a qualitative typology of consulting patterns. The descriptive names of the categories, together with their proportionate sizes and the mean annual consultation rates within the categories were: (1) 'Healthy and competent' (16%; 1.03); (2) 'Contented returners' (12%; 3.28); (3) 'Information seekers' (8%; 4.08); (4) 'Support seekers' (15%; 4.62); (5) 'Drifters' (21%; 2.21) and (6) 'Those hard to convince' (6%; 3.59). The rest (22%; 1.15) could not be classified. The implications of the typology are discussed from two standpoints: (1) In view of the current Finnish debate on the need for fee deterrents for the use of public general practitioner's services. (2) The potentials and limitations of different broad strategies suggested for general practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Kokko, Simo J., 1990. "Long-term patterns of general practice consulting behaviour: A qualitative 9-year analysis of general practice histories of a working-aged rural Finnish population," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 509-515, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:30:y:1990:i:4:p:509-515
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(90)90354-U
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:30:y:1990:i:4:p:509-515. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.