IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v30y1990i10p1131-1138.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The rational use of antischistosomal drugs in schistosomiasis control

Author

Listed:
  • Chandiwana, Stephen K.
  • Taylor, Paul

Abstract

The paper examines the available antischistosomal drugs in Zimbabwe and the use of population-based chemotherapy as an effective strategy of morbidity reduction in schistosomiasis control. The problems of poor drug efficacy and side-effects that were associated with earlier antischistosomal drugs have largely been overcome with the advent of recent, safe and effective oral drugs. The main constraints of population-based chemotherapy are the costs of drug procurement, transport and the logistics of delivery. In highly endemic areas, screening for infection may not be necessary and following pilot surveys mass chemotherapy can be carried out. Nevertheless, anecdotal and unverified reports suggest that mass chemotherapy may result in lightly infected individuals losing their residual immunity and risk heavy reinfection. To lower costs of the drugs and reduce organizational problems of delivery it may be preferable to target treatment at high risk groups. These groups include certain age classes with peak prevalence and intensity of infection and those predisposed to get heavy infections. Treatment prevents the development of overt disease in these high risk groups and also significantly reduces contamination and consequently transmission. However, chemotherapy only results in temporary relief and its impact requires to be sustained by parallel and long-lasting interventions that include improved sanitation, better water supplies and health education. Suggestions are made on how to train and utilize community and public health workers for such control programmes.

Suggested Citation

  • Chandiwana, Stephen K. & Taylor, Paul, 1990. "The rational use of antischistosomal drugs in schistosomiasis control," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 30(10), pages 1131-1138, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:30:y:1990:i:10:p:1131-1138
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(90)90299-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:30:y:1990:i:10:p:1131-1138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.