IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v29y1989i6p695-703.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The long-run cost characteristics of dental practices in the U.S.A

Author

Listed:
  • Brown, L.Jackson

Abstract

The long-run cost structure of U.S. dental practices is analyzed using data collected in 1977 from a representative sample of U.S. dental practices. The practices were stratified by the number of dentists on staff before sampling. Participation rates by the sampled practices of different sizes were approx. 80% and the response rates for the data collection instruments ranged from 84 to 93%. Empirical results show that linear total and L-shaped average long-run cost curves best explain the cost structure of dental practices, indicating that dental technology exhibits constant return to scale. Indivisibilities in production may cause firms with extremely small output to experience higher average costs than their larger counterparts. Any economies due to indivisibilities are exhausted at a rather small practice size. There is no evidence that large group practices have a substantial technical advantage over efficient one, two, and three dentist practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Brown, L.Jackson, 1989. "The long-run cost characteristics of dental practices in the U.S.A," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 29(6), pages 695-703, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:29:y:1989:i:6:p:695-703
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(89)90148-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:29:y:1989:i:6:p:695-703. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.