IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v29y1989i4p555-561.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Family response in head injury: Denial ... or hope for the future?

Author

Listed:
  • Ridley, Barbara

Abstract

Denial is often seen as a major obstacle to successful adaptation in the family of the head-injured. In fact, it is typically inadequately understood in the rehabilitation setting. The term is frequently used in a simplistic way, with the social and cultural factors behind the denial, particularly the stigma of head injury, not examined or confronted. There is very little hard data on what constitutes successful family adaptation over the long term. Professionals have a tendency to focus exclusively on the patient's deficits and the family's difficulties, ignoring the positive ways in which people cope. This article suggests that there is a need for a paradigm shift, based on the transactional theory of stress and coping, in which denial is seen as a positive response in some situations. Instead of becoming locked into trying to dispel what is usually called denial and adopting an adversary stance to the family, it may be more beneficial for rehabilitation staff to work together with family members to understand why head injury is so difficult to deal with, develop positive models for living with the sequelae, and encourage hope for the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Ridley, Barbara, 1989. "Family response in head injury: Denial ... or hope for the future?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 555-561, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:29:y:1989:i:4:p:555-561
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(89)90201-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elizabeth F. McGann & Dorothy Sexton & Deborah A. Chyun, 2008. "Denial and Compliance in Adults With Asthma," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 17(3), pages 151-170, August.
    2. Chase, Rachel P. & McMahon, Shannon A. & Winch, Peter J., 2015. "Injury careers after blast exposure among combat veterans deployed to Iraq or Afghanistan," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 309-316.
    3. Moore, Helen & Gillespie, Alex, 2014. "The caregiving bind: Concealing the demands of informal care can undermine the caregiving identity," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 102-109.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:29:y:1989:i:4:p:555-561. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.