IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v29y1989i3p435-444.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Schools of thought on pain

Author

Listed:
  • Vrancken, Mariet A. E.

Abstract

Through an analysis of the way pain specialists speak about pain and deal with pain patients, the prevailing approaches to pain in eight academic pain centers in the Netherlands have been traced and studied. Major categories for distinguishing between the diverse approaches to pain are: theoretical statements about pain, definitions of pain patients, statements about therapy, and about recovery. On the basis of these categories, five ideal typical schools or approaches have been deduced. After a brief description of these schools, according to the above categories, and from the point of view of an ideal typical adherent (actor) of each school, I proceed to an in-depth inquiry into the major basic assumptions of these approaches with respect to their portrayal of man and the role of medicine. Finally, envisaging the phenomenon of pain within the context of everyday life, a new model is proposed for understanding the experience of pain; this also sheds light on the medical problem of patients with 'intractable' pain.

Suggested Citation

  • Vrancken, Mariet A. E., 1989. "Schools of thought on pain," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 435-444, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:29:y:1989:i:3:p:435-444
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(89)90292-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Crawford, Cassandra S., 2009. "From pleasure to pain: The role of the MPQ in the language of phantom limb pain," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 655-661, September.
    2. Jale Yazar & Roland Littlewood, 2001. "Against Over-Interpretation: the Understanding of Pain Amongst Turkish and Kurdish Speakers in London," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 47(2), pages 20-33, June.
    3. Simon Williams & Ellen Annandale & Jonathan Tritter, 1998. "The Sociology of Health and Illness at the Turn of the Century: Back to the Future?," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 3(4), pages 64-79, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:29:y:1989:i:3:p:435-444. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.