IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v29y1989i10p1175-1181.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are psychological disorders most prevalent among older adults? examining the evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Feinson, Marjorie Chary

Abstract

A persistent popular and professional perception is the high rate of psychological disorders among older adults (age 65 +), especially higher than among younger adults. To examine the perception's accuracy, data from all psychiatric epidemiology studies conducted since 1950 with random community samples were reviewed. The studies were divided into categories according to type of disorder and instrument used. Prevalence rates were recalculated to compare those under 65 and over with those aged 65 and over. The review reveals than in none of the impairment categories do the preponderance of studies document more disorders among older than younger adults. In contrast, studies indicate more disorders reported by younger than older adults for depressive symptoms, major depression (clinical), and clinical affective disorders. While several methodological caveats are warranted, available data do not support the prevailing perception that psychological disorders are most prevalent among older adults. Despite these findings, future policies should consider older adults a high priority for outpatient mental health services. Older persons use disproportionately fewer outpatient services than other adults; over-utilization of primary care services occurs among all age groups, including older persons; and finally, the co-occurence of psychological and physical disorders often results in elders' mental disorders not being recognized or treated appropriately in the primary care sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Feinson, Marjorie Chary, 1989. "Are psychological disorders most prevalent among older adults? examining the evidence," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 29(10), pages 1175-1181, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:29:y:1989:i:10:p:1175-1181
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(89)90360-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:29:y:1989:i:10:p:1175-1181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.