IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v292y2022ics0277953621009138.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What's in the refrigerator? Using an adapted material culture approach to understand health practices and eating habits in the home

Author

Listed:
  • Bird, Tess
  • Jensen, Tenna

Abstract

Health researchers have long acknowledged the limitations of self-reporting in studies of health in the home and have consequently sought various methods to broaden research beyond self-reporting in efficient and productive ways. Our two independent research studies, one in Copenhagen, Denmark (2015), and one in Providence County, Rhode Island, in the United States (2015–2016), illustrate how health researchers can adapt an everyday material culture approach used in anthropology to fit the needs of health and wellbeing studies, particularly when it comes to home-based research on health behavior. Our two studies both utilized one particular household object—the refrigerator—to help explore everyday eating habits in various types of households. By analyzing these separate studies together, we found that using the refrigerator in object-elicitation exercises and photographing the refrigerator provided insights that enhanced the interview process, thereby efficiently addressing some of the limitations of interviews and self-reporting. We also found that the refrigerator was a useful comparative tool both within our individual studies and across our research contexts. We conclude that the refrigerator and other everyday use objects are useful methodological tools in health-related studies in the home, and propose that regularly utilizing the refrigerator may help researchers interpret qualitative data about nutrition and eating habits.

Suggested Citation

  • Bird, Tess & Jensen, Tenna, 2022. "What's in the refrigerator? Using an adapted material culture approach to understand health practices and eating habits in the home," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:292:y:2022:i:c:s0277953621009138
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114581
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953621009138
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114581?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:292:y:2022:i:c:s0277953621009138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.