IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v28y1989i1p93-97.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Three conflicts as a result of causal attributions

Author

Listed:
  • Kroode, Herman Ten
  • Oosterwijk, Mieke
  • Steverink, Nardi

Abstract

There is a difference between the causal attributions of cancer (Ca)-patients and those of myocardial infarction (MI)-patients. MI-patients go through and check their autobiographies looking for the possible causes suggested by the medical world. Ca-patients on the contrary search for possible explanations. This is probably due to the lack of medical knowledge on the cause and course of their disease. They search through their autobiographies and the result is idiosyncratic, very personal attributions with which they create an explanation which is often not in accordance with the physicians' view. These attributions of Ca-patients are a source of conflicts, both within themselves (doubt), with their physicians and with their partners or other close relatives. Nevertheless they stick to their own explanations, although often secretly and with ambivalence, and despite the conflicts which they produce.

Suggested Citation

  • Kroode, Herman Ten & Oosterwijk, Mieke & Steverink, Nardi, 1989. "Three conflicts as a result of causal attributions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 93-97, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:28:y:1989:i:1:p:93-97
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(89)90311-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:28:y:1989:i:1:p:93-97. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.