IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v27y1988i8p769-778.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Folk medicine in Laos: A comparison between two ethnic groups

Author

Listed:
  • Westermeyer, Joseph

Abstract

Folk healing was studied in two ethnic groups of Laos during the period 1965-75. Hmong, mostly illiterate and animistic, lived in highly autonomous villages within an atomistic society, occupying remote and sparsely populated mountains. Lao, mostly literate and Buddhist, lived in lowland towns and villages within a hierarchical and integrated society, occupying the densely populated Mekong flood plain. Folk healing systems of both groups demonstrated similarities regarding folk syndromes and folk modalities. Differences included more complex theories about illness, greater number of folk practitioner types and greater differentiation of the shaman role (i.e. into separate priest and healer roles) in the more complex Lao society.

Suggested Citation

  • Westermeyer, Joseph, 1988. "Folk medicine in Laos: A comparison between two ethnic groups," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 27(8), pages 769-778, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:27:y:1988:i:8:p:769-778
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(88)90229-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    folk healing Hmong Lao;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:27:y:1988:i:8:p:769-778. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.